Home > 2011 > Managing Debt

The Debt Diet Challenge Week #2: Shedding Debt, Losing Weight

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

The Debt Diet is an online behavioral change program to help users get out of debt by putting aside $10 a day.  It was developed by Pro-Change Behavior Systems and Jean Chatzky, author of the best-selling Pay It Down and a coach on The Debt Diet series on the Oprah show.

Jean Chatzky read the applications solicited by Credit.com and chose 5 participants.  She got them started on The Debt Diet and is now speaking to them once a week, answering their questions and helping them to get off to a good start.  For their part, our participants are doing The Debt Diet exercises which include tracking their spending, negotiating monthly bills (using The Debt Diet scripts) and trying to modify their heavy-spending ways.  You can find The Debt Diet ($49.95) at jeanchatzky.com. The participants also blog regularly on Credit.com about their experiences with The Debt Diet.

Debt Dieting, it seems, is good for your waistline as well as your wallet.

I first noticed this phenomenon when I coached the Debt Diet for The Oprah Winfrey Show. Some of the participants not only seemed to be getting their financial acts together, they seemed to be getting their physical ones together, too. I’m seeing the same with this round of Dieters.

Erin reports that she’s been using the elliptical trainer she and her husband bought the first weekend they were on the program. (It may help that it was pricey—in her mind, she’s amortizing. It may also help that it’s so high-tech her husband, while away on business, can connect to the machine to see how much use it’s actually gotten. That’s motivating!) And Chris said, “I’ve actually lost weight—that’s been a benefit.”

[Related article: Jean Chatzky’s Debt Diet: A Behind the Scenes Look]

What’s up with this phenomenon? In part, it’s a result of tracking your spending. Just like logging what you eat (a move Good Housekeeping magazine once called the secret weapon in the weight loss war) tracking your spending makes you more conscious of all the money you spend. And many of us spend a lot more than we would ever think eating out. Seeing the tallies is all it takes for many people to get them to start eating at home. And eating at home—particularly when you grocery shop for the week— is generally much cheaper.

But there’s also a growing body of research that shows making progress in one segment of your like (i.e. with your money) can give you the skills and the boost you need to improve in another part (i.e. physically). Once you learn how to resist one kind of temptation—to convince yourself to walk away from the new iPod or new shoes—you also have the skills to walk away from the cookie. That’s not to say it’s the easiest thing in the world (or that change happens instantaneously—I’m ready for the Debt Dieters to tell me they had a bad day or week). As Dr. Jim Prochaska of Pro-Change Behavior Systems, my partner in devloping the Debt Diet likes to say, “Change is not an event, it’s a process.”

[Featured tool: Get your free Credit Report Card from Credit.com]

Here are a couple of highlights from the week:

Penny found a way to pick up some extra cash. In Penny’s part of the country—like so many others—the business of selling houses is moving like molasses. I’d suggested to Penny since that seemed unlikely to change soon, she might want to look for other ways to bring in some extra income. (You have to remember there are two sides to the equation. You can pay down debt by spending less to free up cash. Or you can do it by just making more money. Tough in this economy, but not impossible.) Penny applied for part-time jobs at Wal-Mart and her local bank. Then she got a call from a firm conducting auctions of homes in foreclosure. They needed some help at an open house. Penny picked up $200 in an afternoon. “I hope there’s more where that came from,” she says.

Chris saved $768 with a single phone call. How? She called her cable company and told them she was prepared to switch to a package with a competitor. “I know if I do that, you’ll call me and offer me promotional pricing to get me back,” she said. “So why not just give me the promo pricing now?” They didn’t even blink—and she’s now saving $64.73 a month.

Lastly, I’m a little worried about Kim. She’s missing phone calls and not filing blog posts. Kim—if you’re out there…I’m here for you!

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team