Home > Personal Finance > Nyah, Congress! No Recess for You!

Comments 0 Comments

Republicans in Congress are so worried that President Obama might name someone to lead a new consumer watchdog agency that they’re refusing to go home. And they’re using a little-known parliamentary rule to keep the Senate cooped up in Washington, D.C., too.

At this rate, the fight over Elizabeth Warren, the de facto chief of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, could keep Congress in session indefinitely.

“The Speaker is certainly concerned about recess appointments,” Michael Steel, spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner (R – OH), said in an email to Credit.com.

You see, normally, the House and Senate take a recess on holidays so members can go home and raise money for their next campaign. But this year, Boehner (R-OH) is refusing to let that happen. Starting on Memorial Day, and continuing this July 4 weekend, Boehner is using his power as leader of Congress to avoid calling a recess. Instead, the House will remain in “pro forma” session, meaning that while most members can go home, a few must stick around to keep the lights on.

The Senate can’t take more than three days off without Boehner’s written approval (who knew?), so he’s refusing to give that, too.

Since the Senate isn’t in recess, President Obama can’t use his power to do a “recess appointment,” which means tapping someone to lead an executive agency without the Senate’s approval.

The most obvious candidate for a recess appointment is Warren, a former Harvard Law professor who successfully lobbied Congress and president Obama to create the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which has the power to monitor things like checking accounts and home loans for abuses that could hurt borrowers.

Known for her fiery speaking style and penchant for skewering the leaders of the nation’s largest banks, Warren is a polarizing figure—beloved by consumer advocates, not so much by many Republicans and bank CEOs.

[Related article: Even if You Don’t Use a Bank, New Bank Watchdog Plans to Defend You]

Banking industry leaders are in the middle of an all-out war to blunt the power of the consumer bureau. With their support, Republicans have introduced bills in Congress that would cut the agency’s funding, make its budget subject to Congressional approval, and replace the director’s position with a five-member board.

In a letter to President Obama, 44 Republican senators write that “we believe that the Senate should not consider any nominee to be CFBB director until the CFPB is properly reformed.”

Warren isn’t the only possible Obama nominee that Republicans are worried about, according to a Republican Congressional aide.

Meanwhile, Warren’s supporters have called on the president to appoint her, despite the Republicans’ roadblocks. Since her nomination would be dead-on-arrival in the Republican-controlled House, consumer advocates are pressuring the administration to circumvent Congress using a recess appointment.

“He’s got to fight back against the Republican allegations in both the House and the Senate that they somehow call the shots on presidential nominees. They don’t,” says Ed Mierzwinski, director of consumer programs at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group. “We believe the president has the authority to make a recess appointment.”

Others wonder whether Boehner’s no-recess rule isn’t just political posturing, since the Obama administration doesn’t appear ready to capitalize on a Senate recess anyway. President Obama has yet to even nominate Warren to lead the bureau, which he must do before officially appointing her. Far from sneaking Warren in as a recess appointment, some consumer advocates wonder whether the administration is even paying attention.

Besides, Obama uses his appointment power sparingly. In eight years, President George W. Bush made 171 recess appointments, according to a study by the Congressional Research Service. Bill Clinton made 139.

So far, Obama has made just 15 such appointments.

“He has just not acted. He hasn’t shown leadership,” says Travis Plunkett, lobbyist for the Consumer Federation of America. “While the Republican position is indefensible from a consumer protection point of view, the administration must share some of the blame for the fact that the bureau will probably open its doors without a leader in place.”

With or without a director, the bureau is scheduled to open July 21.

[Related article: In Defense of Consumer Protection]

Image: Diego Torres Silvestre, via Flickr

This article was updated July 6, 2011 to correct the attribution for the letter to President Obama.  The letter was not drafted by the American Bankers Association.

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team