Home > Identity Theft > Missing Morgan Stanley Data: Who’s to Blame?

Comments 0 Comments

Two CD-ROMs containing the private information of 34,000 investment clients of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney still have not been found, but the controversy over who’s to blame for the data breach continues to grow. In statements to Credit.com, Morgan Stanley and the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance blame each other for the mess.

“We were notified by the state that the package appeared to be intact when it arrived at the facility, however the discs were not contained in it when it was given to the intended recipient” inside the department, Jim Wiggins, a spokesman for Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, told us.

Not so fast, says the state. If Morgan Stanley had bothered to encrypt the CDs before sending them, none of this would have happened. The state doesn’t know where the CDs are now, but that doesn’t mean it lost them, says Susan Burns, a spokeswoman for the tax department.

[Article: The Weakest Link: Feds Fail with Cyber Security Proposal]

Maybe they were lost in the mail, Burns says.

“We have no information that we can use to corroborate that the two compact disks were in the envelope when it arrived at the Department,” Burns said in an email. ”We cannot determine whether the disks were lost in transit via the US Postal Service or within the Department.”

Why does it even matter that two CD-ROMs are missing? Because they contained the names and Social Security numbers of a number of wealthy New Yorkers. The data concerned investors in tax-advantaged bonds, which tend to be investors with quite a bit of money, says Adam K. Levin, founder and chairman of Credit.com.

Since neither side knows where the CDs are, no one can say whether the data was stolen, or whether it’s merely sitting innocently on the wrong person’s desk.

What’s interesting is that the whole episode has exposed some confusion about what the law actually says regarding data transmissions of this type. The law in question is the New York Information Security Breach and Notification Act (ISBNA). In her original emailed statement, Burns said that while the CDs were protected by passwords, “(u)nfortunately, password protected is not the equivalent of encrypted which is the requirement of ISBNA and industry best practice.”

[Consumer Resource: Get your free Credit Report Card from Credit.com]

Later, the tax department learned differently. The state law does not require companies to encrypt data; rather, it says only that if unencrypted data is lost, companies must notify consumers and regulatory agencies of a possible data breach. In case you really want to dig into this, here’s the law itself.

“We believe we were in compliance with requirements” set forth by the law, Wiggins says.

Then there’s the question of how the data was sent. Some websites have suggested that Morgan Stanley could have used a secure data pipeline to send the data. This turns out not to be the case. While the Department of Taxation and Finance does now have a secure pipeline that allows for encrypted data transmissions, they didn’t ask Morgan Stanley to use the application because the software “was not fully implemented until after the request for annual data was sent,” Burns says.

Related articles

Morgan Stanley Data Breach Hits Investors

The Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Breach: Losing Client Data the Old Fashioned Way

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team