Home > Credit Cards > Fed: Antitrust Agreement Won’t Lower Swipe Fees

Comments 0 Comments

In case you haven’t noticed, there have been some big fights over the small fees consumers pay every time they swipe their debit cards. The loudest fight was over the Durbin Amendment, part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law, which called for a cap on all debit swipe fees. After an expensive year-long battle, the Fed finally announced a rule that limits the fees to about 21 cents per swipe.

[Related Article: After Epic Battle, Swipe Fee War Ends in a Draw]

Meanwhile, a quieter effort has been underway to reduce the fees. On Oct. 4, 2010 the Justice Department sued Visa, MasterCard and American Express, saying that their 70% control of the debit card market gave them monopoly power to charge unreasonably high fees.

By Oct. 13, the companies and the government reached a settlement. Instead of imposing rules limiting swipe fees, the agreement relies on the marketplace try to reduce fees by allowing retailers to advertise which cards they prefer to use, and offer discounts to customers using debit cards that cost the merchants less money per swipe.

The agreement seemed like the classic “win-win.” Regulators got to show they were doing something to lower swipe fees. And the major credit card networks got to evade potentially costly new regulations.

But there’s a problem, says the Boston branch of the Federal Reserve: The agreement probably won’t work. That’s because most small retailers don’t understand the payment networks well enough to take advantage of the new rules.

Market discipline only works when all players in the market understand the rules, the Fed says. But the credit card networks are so complex that most retailers, especially small ones, have no clue how they work.

[Related Article: What the Debit Card Interchange Rules Mean for Consumers]

“(W)e find that merchants are unlikely to be able to take full advantage of the Proposed Settlement’s new freedoms because they currently lack comprehensible and complete information on the full and exact merchant discount fees for their customers’ credit cards,” the Boston Fed found in its study.

One simple problem, by way of example: to take advantage of the new rules, merchants would have to go into their swipe machines sitting next to their cash registers and change the settings for how much to charge each different type of card. For most small businesspeople, who don’t know the finer points of swipe machine calibration, the Fed finds this to be an impossible expectation.

All of which means that if you were hoping the agreement might save you a couple cents each morning on your cup of coffee, don’t hold your breath.

Or, as the Fed so poetically writes, “As the Proposed Settlement currently stands, merchants may not be able to exercise price differentiation due to an inherent lack of detailed knowledge of the level of merchant fees.”

[Featured Product: Research and Compare Secured Credit Card Offers on Credit.com]

Image © Andre BlaisDreamstime.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team