Home > Personal Finance > Congressman Supports Preemption of State Consumer Protection Laws

Comments 0 Comments

In the fight over who caused the Great Recession of 2008, the voices saying “I told you so” are many and loud. Some of the loudest are those calling out the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which during the late 1990s and early 2000s used its power of preemption to overrule state laws that cracked down on predatory mortgage lending.

Those laws could have stopped the subprime mortgage crisis before it started, according to the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. These days, many consumer advocates point to the OCC’s actions as one of the major mistakes of the last bubble.

“The inability of states to enforce their own consumer protection laws—even as federal regulators stood idly by—was a major factor in the reckless lending that has cost taxpayers trillions of dollars,” Kathleen Day, spokeswoman for the Center for Responsible Lending, wrote in a letter to President Obama.

In contrast, the people who still support the idea of federal agencies usurping state laws tend to speak much more quietly, but with equal force. Last week Randy Neugebauer (R-TX), chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight, chastised the Treasury Department for trying to limit the OCC’s preemption power.

Here’s the backstory. Last summer, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank financial reform law, which banned the OCC from preempting state laws except in extraordinary circumstances. This spring, the OCC responded with a proposal that effectively brushed that provision aside. The agency plans to continue citing a 1996 Supreme Court ruling to continue preempting state laws whenever it pleases, paying lip service to Dodd-Frank by running its plans by the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

George W. Madison, the Treasury’s lead lawyer, blasted the OCC for ignoring Congress.

“The notion that the new standard does not have any effect runs afoul of basic canons of statutory construction; it is also contrary to the legislative history,” Madison wrote in his letter. We wrote about the dust-up here.

[Related article: The OCC Enters the Thunderdome: Bank Regulators Do Battle]

So now Neugebauer, a Republican who voted against Dodd-Frank, is sticking up for preemption and the OCC. He sent a letter to the Treasury, demanding that the Treasury hand over all documents, records and communications regarding its letter on preemption, plus a chronology of all meetings about the issue.

The stated goal of the inquiry is to make sure Treausry isn’t overstepping its authority. The unstated goal: To rebuke, ever so quietly, regulators who want state consumer protection laws to stick.

“We seek assurances that the Treasury has permitted the OCC to act independently,” Neugebauer said in his letter.

The old adage says “You might like the sausage, but you don’t want to see how it’s made.” This little incident shows that work of Congress and federal regulators making sausage, in all its messy detail. Stay tuned—there’s a lot more meat to come.

[Resource: Not sure where you stand credit wise? Get your Free Credit Report Card to find out.]

Image: Martin Börjesson, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team