Home > 2011 > Personal Finance

Woman: Bank of America Evicted Me for Following Bank’s Instructions

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

After instructing a California woman to miss her mortgage payments in order to qualify for a new loan, Bank of America foreclosed on the woman because she missed her mortgage payments. Annette Lake of Santa Clara was evicted from her home on May 24, and moved into her father’s basement.

A Bank of America spokesperson defended the bank’s decision, saying it was based on a review of Lake’s finances.

The ordeal began in 2008, according to the St. George News, when Lake and her husband divorced. Soon she was diagnosed with breast cancer, and was laid off from her job because of chemotherapy treatments, which made it challenging to pay her monthly mortgage.

Lake called Bank of America to ask for help. A bank representative told her that because she was current with her payments, there was nothing BofA could do. But if she stopped paying for three months the bank employee told her, she could qualify for lower payments under the federal Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP).

“They told me they couldn’t assist me because I was paid up to date,” Lake told the newspaper. “I had to be behind on my payments before they would give me assistance.”

[Article: Senate Dems Urge Regulators To Go Tougher on Mortgage Middlemen]

So Lake stopped making payments. The technique seemed to work; Lake received a modified mortgage through HAMP, lowering her payments to $728.50 each month.

But the day after her mother died, in June 2010, Lake received a foreclosure notice. Why? Because she had missed a number of payments. Lake and her 15-year-old daughter were evicted. Now they share a bedroom in her father’s basement.

From Bank of America’s perspective, the story is somewhat different. Lake was never given a permanent loan modification. Instead, her modification was just a trial. But when the bank looked more deeply into Lake’s finances, it determined she couldn’t afford even the new, cheaper mortgage.

“In the final review of her updated and verified financials, we could not qualify her for a permanent HAMP modification within the government program guidelines,” Rick Simon, a BofA spokesman, said in an email. “A second-look review was conducted, but we were not able to structure a proprietary modification or other alternative within the tolerance of the mortgage investor.”

Under the government program, many people who received temporary modifications failed to qualify for permanent ones. As early as October 2009, “it was becoming clear that the rate of conversion from trial modifications to permanent modifications was very slow,” according to a report by Troubled Asset Relief Program’s Inspector General.

Meanwhile, Lake has given up hope of ever getting back into her home, which she bought in 1986. Instead, she is looking for a way to sue Bank of America over the incident.

“I honestly understand how people become homeless and how they give up and say they don’t care,” Lake said. “You get to the point where you don’t care. I get it. You just feel like saying, ‘Fine, you win.'”

[Resource: Get your free Credit Report Card]

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team