Home > 2011 > Mortgages

Wells Fargo Drops Reverse Mortgages: Is Financing Option Still Viable?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 2 Comments

Last week, mega-bank Wells Fargo announced it will stop selling reverse mortgages to senior citizens. It was the second large bank to drop such loans, after Bank of America made the same decision in February.

But does that mean reverse mortgages are a bad deal for seniors? Does it mean such loans will no longer be available? Absolutely not, says Terry Wakefield, a mortgage-industry consultant.

What it means is that consumers will have to pay more attention to the details when considering whether reverse mortgages offered by other lenders are right for them. It all depends on where you live.

“To make a reverse mortgage in a market where the values are in question makes absolutely no sense,” says Wakefield, who points out that some cities have watched their home values drop by as much as 40%. “Where reverse lending makes a lot of sense is in markets that have not been impacted as much by the decline in home values.”

What is a Reverse Mortgage?

Reverse mortgages are a strange animal. Created by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in 1987, they allow people over age 62 with lots of equity in their homes to get money in exchange for their home. Consumers can choose to get their money immediately in a lump sum, as a line of credit, or stretched out in fixed monthly payments. Either way, the lender gets ownership of the house when the borrower dies or moves.

Such arrangements made a lot of sense for both sides when housing values were on the rise. Now that some real estate markets are stuck in seemingly irreversible decline, however, major banks like Wells have decided to get out entirely.

The government’s reverse mortgage program “was designed in a different economic time,” Wells Fargo said in a press release.

[Related: Making Sense of Reverse Mortgages]

Specifically, the program bars lenders from considering anything more than the age of the borrower and the value of the home when deciding whether to give a reverse mortgage. That’s a problem now because many homeowners with reverse mortgages can no longer afford to pay insurance or real estate taxes on their homes, says Peter Bell, president and CEO of the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association.

If homeowners fall behind on their taxes, the lender is stuck holding the bag, Bell says. If the house burns down and there’s no insurance on it, the lender is similarly stuck. Either way, the business has become simply too risky for some large banks.

Bell’s association is lobbying HUD to allow lenders to either place some of the lender’s money away in escrow to cover any unpaid taxes and insurance, and to allow lenders to do more robust underwriting to make sure borrowers won’t get into such a jam in the first place.

Even then, reverse mortgages would still make sense for some people, Bell argues.

“For a senior that is cash-constrained and finding it difficult to make ends meet on a day-to-day basis, and if they have a mortgage that’s sucking up a lot of their income, they can use the reverse mortgage to get cash now, or to pay off their mortgage,” Bell says.

What To Do If You Want A Reverse Mortgage

Just because Wells Fargo and Bank of America have stopped offering reverse mortgages does not mean such loans are no longer available. For a list of lenders offering reverse loans, check out HUD’s website, here.

Before you apply, you will be required to attend a counseling session with a government-approved expert to figure out whether a reverse mortgage is right for you. You can take the first step by checking out the AARP’s calculator, which uses your financial information to determine whether you qualify.

For more information about different types of reverse mortgages, see this HUD website.

[Related article: HUD Eases Surviving Spouses’ Mortgage Burden]

Update: Tim Ryan, a Phoenix-based reverse mortgage specialist, wrote us after this story was posted and gave us some interesting details about reverse mortgages. Actually, Ryan says, while banks do get repaid after the reverse-mortgage borrower dies or moves, that repayment can take many forms, and often does not include the bank taking ownership of the house. In some cases the heirs or the estate decide to keep the house and repay the lender through other means. Other times they sell the home and use the money to repay the lender. In cases where the home is underwater, the heirs can turn the house over to the federal department of Housing and Urban Development, which sells the house and gives the proceeds to the lender. If the home was insured by HUD (as millions of homes are), the government pays the difference between the value of the mortgage and the sale price.

Thanks for the additional info, Tim!

Image © Irisangel | Dreamstime.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Pingback: Wells Fargo Drops Reverse Mortgages: Is Financing Option Still Viable? | Brian Brown's Official Website()

  • Pingback: Wells Fargo Drops Reverse Mortgages: Is Financing Option Still Viable? « Tax Australia()

  • Richard Bell

    Three to four years ago my mothers house payments were getting to high for her income. So we checked into a reverse mortgage program which sounded good, the payments would drop from the low $700s to just the cost of insurance and taxes.
    The only problem was my name was on the title because I build the home for mother and a large part of the cost to build the house came from a $35,000 Inheritance from my father who passed away 1980, also to build the home like she wanted it cost me $25,000 out of my own pocket and I had to remove my name from the title because the house had to be in her name only with the reverse mortgage. My mother has dementia now and we are not sure how long she will live. How can I keep the home and make payments on it if the value droped from $179,000 to around $99,000 and if I can get rid of the reverse mortgage. The payoff of the mortgage is around $149,000
    and I would not pay that much when the home is not worth it and no one would finance it at that value anyway, Please Advise . Richard

    • http://www.LoansByMarkR.com Mark Richards

      I did not get to finish my questions nor comments from before. By the way, this is my understanding of your situation & not necessarily the opinion of my company Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation,

      If there is a power of attorney, guardianship or some legal instrument like that setup, 6 months after your mom moves out of the home, it could be refinanced into your name and you would owe the lesser of 95% of it’s current value or the loan balance. If it appraises at 100,000, than you would be taking a loan based on 95,000 for instance.

      While your mom is still living in the home, there is no action you can take to change title.

      I strongly suggest you get in touch with an elder care / estate attorney and set this up properly.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team