Home > 2011 > Managing Debt

Credit.com and Jean Chatzky Announce The Debt Diet Participants

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 4 Comments

As we kick off The Debt Diet—and introduce you to our five participants—first, let me say thank you to everyone who applied to be a part of this project. I know that sharing information on your financial lives, and your financial struggles, isn’t easy and I appreciate the trust and faith you have in me. I wish I could have chosen every one of you, but in the end I picked the five participants for a few reasons: I was looking for variety in the situations, readiness for change in the applications (because if you’re not ready, this program is not going to work), and—quite honestly—people I felt The Debt Diet could help.

My heart went out to one applicant in particular, a 52-year-old man who suddenly lost his mother a year and a half ago and has seen his spending out of control since then. He has over $130,000 in credit card debt on more than 30 different cards. The Debt Diet might be able to help him change his behavior and stop spending, but it isn’t the right tool for helping him deal with this credit card debt. He needs credit counseling. So although I didn’t pick him, I will be reaching out to him and finding him a counselor to work with.

Here’s a look at the people I did pick—in brief—and what I hope to accomplish with them over the next few months.  They’ll be blogging their progress regularly and I’ll be writing as well, spotlighting the universal challenges we all face when trying to escape debt.

I hope you’ll follow along.

Meet Penny »

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Frances

    Why are certain people “picked”? Frankly this makes me suspicious, that only those selected have problems (financial) that can actually be easily resolved.
    Sounds like a fixed project to me. An ad for a program or a website or book (future book perhaps? another simplistic 210-page “money magic” fixer?)…I’ll skip it.

  • Michael Schreiber

    Thanks for your note, Frances. The point of this exercise is to take a look at the efficacy of the program… see how it works, if it helps, and then you, the reader, can judge for yourself as to whether the program is worthwhile. I can guarantee you that this project is not designed to promote a book or anything of the sort, and the reason why certain applicants were selected over others is because there is no one size fits all solution for personal debt. The people Ms. Chatzky picked were selected because, as she noted in the article above, in her opinion they were the ones who could most likely be helped by the program. Now we’ll be putting that judgement to the test and see how they actually do. If you’re so inclined, we invite you to follow the progress of the participants, as we will, and judge for yourself.

    • Frances

      I really doubt if lack of success would be reported. Americans are skeptical nowadays. I’ve never seen these personal finance experts, who are always on the verge of or trying to sell (ing) something, own up when their solutions ar too simplistic or their are flaws in their programs. The only comments you ever see on these projects are positive, and they tend to be overly so, like these people have found a new religion. Like an Amazon recommendation (written it turns out by friends). If I follow, it will be to decifer how flaws and shortcomings of the program (which are inevitable, after all) are reported and dealt with (honestly). And passing it along as tips to my friends who are reporters.
      Americans are hurting. We need experts, not individuals who are in it for a buck, for the publicity, for the plug, for themselves. In my opinion.

  • Michael Schreiber

    While I can understand why you might think that, I can guarantee you that lack of success will be reported. We’ve put together a team of top notch experts, reporters and editors, whose sole purpose is to make the murky world of credit and personal finance clearer for people… to help them make smarter and more informed financial decisions. We were interested in the idea that personal debt problems can be mitigated by behavior modification techniques, as the debt diet promises… which is why we’re doing this series. Please read our first story on it here, which quotes both boosters and detractors: http://blog.credit.com/2011/04/jean-chatzkys-debt-diet-a-behind-the-scenes-look/
    In any event, we welcome both your scrutiny and your feedback.

  • Pingback: Credit.com and Jean Chatzky Announce The Debt Diet Participants | Financeation()

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team