Home > Mortgages > Deutsche Bank Sued for Fraud; Billions at Stake

Comments 1 Comment

The United States and the city of Los Angeles filed two different lawsuits against a German Bank this week. The federal lawsuit accuses Deutsche Bank of mortgage fraud.

Meanwhile, the city alleges that “Deutsche Bank has become one of the largest slumlords in the City of Los Angeles.”

In the federal lawsuit, U.S. Attorney for southern New York Preet Bharara accuses Deutsche Bank of defrauding American taxpayers of millions, and potentially billions, of dollars. The bank and its U.S.-based subsidiary, MortgageIT, received insurance from the Federal Housing Administration for more than 39,000 home loans, worth over $5 billion, according to the complaint, filed Tuesday in New York’s Southern District Court.

[Free Tool: Obtain your Identity Risk Score from Credit.com]

But there was a problem: many of those loans never qualified for government insurance in the first place, according to the suit.

“Deutsche Bank ignored every type of red flag and breached every duty of due diligence before underwriting thousands of federally insured mortgages,” Bharara said in a press release. “While the homes the defendants issued loans for may have been built on solid ground, the defendants’ lending practices were built on quicksand.”

In the scam, MortgageIT’s employees allegedly lied on the applications, winning federal insurance for mortgages in which borrowers failed to state their income or make downpayments in accordance with federal insurance rules. With the government promising to compensate investors if the loans failed, MortgageIT was able to charge investors higher prices for the loans, thus allegedly earning themselves more money on the deals.

Of the 39,000 mortgages for which MortgageIT won federal insurance, 3,100 have already failed, costing American taxpayers $386 million, according to the lawsuit.

“(T)hese lenders put millions of dollars of taxpayer funds at risk and violated the integrity of this important program by making false certifications to HUD,” Tony West, chief of the Justice Department’s civil division, said in a press release.

The losses so far may be just the tip of the iceberg. The problem with lenders filing fraudulent applications for FHA insurance was first uncovered in a report by the agency’s inspector general, which found that fully half of all mortgages insured by the federal government never met qualifications for the insurance in the first place. That could force taxpayers to pay over $8.4 billion in fraudulent claims, as we reported in March.

If that ratio holds true in Deutsche Bank’s case, that would mean the bank may have fraudulently received federal insurance for $2.5 billion worth of loans. With the U.S. attorney seeking treble damages, that translates to a potential fine of $7.5 billion for Deutsche Bank.

In Los Angeles, the city’s lawsuit accuses Deutsche Bank of failing to maintain more than 2,200 foreclosed properties. The suit also alleges that the bank wrongfully evicted thousands of people.

“We must fight blight by holding banks accountable when they create vacant nuisance properties that pose threats to our residents and destroy the quality of life in our neighborhoods, and we must protect vulnerable tenants from illegal evictions,” City Attorney Carmen Trutanich said in a press release.

Deutsche Bank responded by saying the city is suing the wrong party. According to comments made by a spokesman to American Banker, the bank serves as the trustee on the loans in question; and a different company actually services the loans, and is responsible for evictions and maintaining foreclosed properties.

Deutsche Bank did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

[Related article: Government May Owe $8.4 Billion on Fraudulent Loans]

Image © Andreas Weber | Dreamstime.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team