Home > Identity Theft > Two Lawsuits, Millions of Plaintiffs, One Question: Does Privacy Matter?

Comments 0 Comments

Cursor_Mykl_Roventine_CCFlickr[UPDATE: Some offers mentioned below have expired and/or are no longer available on our site. You can view the current offers from our partners in our credit card marketplace. DISCLOSURE: Cards from our partners are mentioned below.]

When Jared Reagan and David Pitner decided to sue YouPorn.com, the irony was pretty obvious. Here they were, suing a company for invading their privacy, even as the lawsuit itself informed a federal judge and the rest of the world about their own private behavior: That Reagan and Pitner regularly watch porn.

“Certainly they were embarrassed,” says Majed Nachawati, Reagan and Pitner’s attorney.

But the fact that Pitner and Reagan were willing to put their names to a lawsuit against YouPorn underscores how serious the company’s privacy violations really were, their lawyer says. “They were more worried about the fact that these people were disseminating our data to people who shouldn’t have had access to it” says Nachawati.

Just a few months ago, the topic of online tracking wasn’t so prominent on the public’s radar. That changed noticeably with the recent uproar over Apple’s secret tracking of users. Within days of the revelation that iPhones and iPads automatically record their users’ locations down to the city block, Apple received a letter from Senator Al Franken and a lawsuit from consumers alleging the practice violates privacy.

The Apple controversy may have scored serious media attention, but before that, two lawsuits were already leading the consumer charge to reign in suspected privacy abuses. One is Pitner and Reagan’s suit against YouPorn, one of the web’s largest pornography sites. The other lawsuit is against Interclick, a large online ad network that works behind-the-scenes to run advertising campaigns for some of the world’s largest corporations, including McDonald’s and CBS.

Together, these lawsuits may play a major role in defining the future of privacy and advertising online, according to industry observers.

“The problem is that they said one thing to consumers and then they did another, in an underhanded fashion,” says Pam Dixon, executive director of the World Privacy Forum, an online privacy rights group. “I think that’s a really legitimate thing to put to a legal test.”

[Article: Congress Probes Google, Apple on Tracking]

Different Technologies, Similar Results »

Image: Mykl Roventine, via Flickr.com

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team