Home > Credit Score > Credit Report Mistakes? Here’s How to Fix Them

Comments 2 Comments

When you find a mistake on your credit report, the advice is always the same: dispute it. It is your right under federal law to dispute incorrect or incomplete information with both the credit reporting agency (or agencies) reporting the data, as well as with the furnisher—the issuing credit card company, auto lender or debt collector, for example. Typically, the furnisher must investigate and respond within thirty days.

But just because an item is disputed doesn’t mean it will be fixed. In written testimony submitted to the House Financial Services committee in 2007, Stuart K. Pratt of the industry group the Consumer Data Industry Association (CDIA), said that out of 52 million credit file disclosures reviewed by consumers, only 1.98% resulted in a dispute where data was deleted. Here are five reasons why credit report disputes don’t always get results.

The human touch is missing. At least that’s the take of the National Consumer Law Center. In its 2009 report, Automated Injustice: How A Mechanized Dispute System Frustrates Consumers Seeking To Fix Errors In Their Credit Reports, NCLC explains that the system for handling disputes is highly automated.

Here is how it works: When you dispute an item, it is coded using a two- or three-digit code corresponding to the reason for the dispute (“account not mine,” for example). While this can be done online, if you choose to mail in your dispute, the person processing it will code it. The consumer reporting agencies’ computer then “talks” to the furnisher’s computer. If the item is “confirmed” as correct, you’ll be told that. If the furnisher does not respond, it will be removed. If the furnisher confirms there is an error, it will be corrected.

While this system can be highly efficient, the NCLC believes it also creates problems for consumers trying to get items corrected. They point to a couple of specific problems:

  • Failure (by the CRA) to send supporting documentation to creditors and other information providers (furnishers) as required by the FCRA.
  • Limited role of employees who handle disputes (or of foreign workers employed by their offshore vendors) to little more than selecting these two- or three digit codes. Workers do not examine documents, contact consumers by phone or email, or exercise any form of human discretion in resolving a dispute.

In other words, what consumers normally expect of an investigation—someone thoroughly reviewing documents, making phone calls, asking questions, etc.—is not likely to happen.

It’s the creditor’s word against yours. At least that’s the perception. The reality is that in the highly automated dispute process just described, no one is siding with or against the consumer—computers are simply communicating. Still, unless the furnisher agrees the information is wrong, or the consumer proves it’s inaccurate (and can get someone to pay attention to that proof), it may continue to be deemed “accurate.”

Norm Magnuson, CDIA Vice President of Public Affairs, believes that consumers have more leverage than they realize. “I don’t buy that argument that lenders don’t really care. I think they do. But none of us are infallible,” he insists. “The creditor is probably predisposed to work with its customers. Creditors know their customers can take their business elsewhere.”

You’re mixed up with someone else. According to the NCLC’s report, “mixed files occur largely because the credit bureaus’ computers do not use sufficiently rigorous criteria to match consumer data precisely, even when such unique identifiers as SSNs are present.” Mixed files can be a persistent problem for someone with a common name, or someone who has a relative by the same name (Jr., Sr., for example).

Evan Hendricks, founder of Privacy Times and author of Credit Scores and Credit Reports: How The System Really Works, What You Can Do (3rd edition), says that when you dispute an item because you don’t believe it belongs to you, the credit reporting agency may “soft delete” or “cloak” the item. It’s not removed from the system, but is flagged to help prevent it from reappearing on your report. “Mixed files continue to be a problem,” he says. But “we don’t have the research we need (to determine the extent).”

What you think is a mistake isn’t. Over the years I’ve spoken with many people who have misconceptions about how the credit reporting system works. For example, they think that an account that was paid off years ago should not be on their credit reports. (Not true. As long as information is not negative, it may be reported indefinitely, and those older accounts may be helpful.)  Another example: expecting up-to-the moment balances on credit cards. (In reality there may be a lag between the time when you pay a credit card bill and the balance is updated with the credit reporting agencies.)

In written testimony submitted to the House Financial Services committee in 2007, Stuart K. Pratt of the CDIA asserted that “Many disputes, perhaps as much as 55 percent, are in reality a request for an update of accurate data.

Your dispute is flagged for fraud. Credit reporting agencies say that as many as a third of all disputes come from credit repair clinics that flood them with challenges to accurate, but unfavorable, information. Under the FCRA, they are allowed to refuse to investigate disputes of “frivolous” information.

[Resource: Get your free Credit Report Card]

Tips for Disputing Credit Report Mistakes—and Getting Results »

Pages: 1 2

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team