Home > 2011 > Mortgages

California “Strike Force” Will Target Mortgage Fraud at All Levels

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 11 Comments

California will start its own mortgage fraud “strike force” to investigate alleged corruption at every stage of the lending process, from loan origination through the sale of mortgage-backed securities, according to a recent announcement by Kamala D. Harris, the state’s attorney general.

“Families are losing their homes, while those who perpetrated crimes and frauds against them walk free,” Harris said in a press release. “(W)e will prosecute to the fullest extent of the law those who take advantage of trusting California families.”

The strike force will have 25 attorneys and investigators spread between Los Angeles, San Francisco and Fresno. One team will focus on crimes against consumers, including deceptive marketing, predatory lending, and scammers offering bogus loan modification and foreclosure avoidance programs. Another team will specialize in large-scale frauds, including money laundering and illegal investment schemes. The third team will focus on corporate crimes, especially in the area of mortgage-backed securities sold to investors.

At the press conference announcing the strike force, Harris was joined by Los Angeles mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa and Paul Leonard, director of the California office of the Center for Responsible Lending.

“The fingerprints of illegal activity are all over the foreclosure crisis,” Leonard said. “The Attorney General’s effort marries the need to punish bad actors for the practices that brought our economy to the brink with the need to eliminate the scam artists who have since attempted to profit from it.”

Villaraigosa also welcomed the new effort, since Los Angeles witnessed nearly 10,000 foreclosures last year. In 2010 there were 546,669 foreclosure filings in the state.

[Related article: New Legislation Aims to Curb Mortgage Servicer Abuses]

Image: Erin Pettigrew, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • adria

    great idea, I wonder if it will be effective.

  • Euel Allen

    AG K. Harris, all I can say is thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you. We as the people in the state of California there is no way that we can save our home and ourself with out your deportment stepping up as you have done. May god bless you at all time.

    Euel Allen
    Oakland CA

  • boots

    AG of california must start cleaning up the foreclosing attorneys in Ca such as McCarthy & Holthus, Pite Duncan, Quality loan Servicing Corp. NDex West, ETS Trust, T.D. Trust Co. and many more debt collectors who are in concert with the loan servicer, Title Co. to mass produce manufactured documents created by LPS and many more fraudsters including real estates brokers.

    • http://bradandjessie1970.blogspot.com/ Jessica

      Who owns NDex West ?

  • Steve

    Start with the Department of Real Estate (DRE) who protects their own. If every mortgage broker in Calif. was investigated you wouldn’t have a DRE. Then go look at the Title Escrow Companies to find the documents that are missing or wont give up without a subpoena. This will lead you to all the bankrupt mortgage originators that can’t be found. After that you’ll find the lenders had already been charged by the SEC for stated-income and accounting fraud and settled. Buy a home? Never again!!!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/lacayohome lacayo

    Email: lacayofamilyhome@gmail.com

    I wish they would more fast enough to look at our case regarding a wrongful foreclosure due to fraud from Bank of America/Chase Home Finance/Fannie Mae.
    Attorney General, please help!!!

  • Joyce Jones

    I was wondering if I can get some help in understanding the foreclosing procedures
    I was doing a short sale since august 2010 my agent did everything that was requested by my mortgage company she had two buyers that was willing to pay more than what the company was asking for the first one was in august buyer offer almost 4 thousand more
    then the last buyer was 2 thousand more I received escow papers ready sign and return then they foreclose on 5-26-11 I was told that this was Fraudulant on how they handle this When my agent call the company they just tell her why are we even talking about this the house have been sold) and now they telling her that there were never a negotiator even tho she have been speaking to him. Now they will not return her calls or e-mail Did this company do something wrong any information will be greatly appreciated.

  • Lyndel C. Head

    2011 is the 50th of my 55 yrs. of age that I’ve resided on family owned property in Kingsburg Ca.,and looks like will be my last.The last acre of what started out as 20 was Gift Deeded to me in 2002 by my now deceased mom with the “Home Place” house. And my 2nd dwelling mobilehome there since 1991 to enable me to care, and then beginning in 2001,Total Care for her, until her passing mid-2002.I shopped a loan for improvments only asking for 20K as the place was free and clear of debt. A loan officer at Honey Mae told me,”no problem”. But after weeks passed advised me his boss said 40K was the least,a few more weeks later 60K,and the day before wiring the money told me,”I put another 5K in the loan,if you don’t need it just make payments with it.” Renters, a.k.a. Squatters, caused me to default,and 1 day before foreclosier auction I was issued a 3 month Forebearance.Upon making the 1st of those payments I then sold my most prized possession,a 1934 Plymouth Cpe I had 75% restored over a period of 32 years.I paid all late payments,charges,fees,penalties,and interests,as per my then mortgager,H.S.B.C. USA quoted me was due.I made the 2 additional forbearance payments and was anticipating communications from H.S.B.C. USA as to a loan modification offer they made at the time the forebearance was issued.I found it odd I recieved no reciepts for the nearly $5500.00 I had sent them in that 3 month period.I couldn’t seem to get the right department to return letters or taake my calls.I recieved 3 or 4 identicle letters from them threatening I needed to pay my property taxes,which were just due.I did so and sent them a photo copy. But still didn’t know what amount my next monthly payment was to be.On that month I came home one day of the first week of that month and found a 3-day notice to quit on my door stating I was the former owner and an equity purchaser, M.R.O.Investments Inc., as the new owner. Nothing was ever posted noticing me of the alleged trustee auction on the property,I wasn’t given notice by mail , I wasn’t able to produce , by my own research, any newspaper notices, I was ignored for my request for a QWR. M.R.O. Investments Inc. bribed my tenants with a check for $2500.00 to relocate, eliminating my only source of income , due to being disabled. Which is yet another nightmare experience ongoing with S.S.I. , Medi-Cal , Human resources ,Yata ,Yata, WOW! I’ve lived on $200.00 a month Food Stamps for the last year I’ve been fighting an Unlawful Detainer lawsuit,of which I just got ruled against, 7-7-11 and facing a lock out date of 7-20-11 @ 6:01 am. I have no where to go,no money,no vehicle, no phone, I’ve sold off accumulated possessions,furniture, airlooms,etc. I am now trying to liquidate litteraly,down to my 5-man tent . All attorneys I’ve talked to want $10,000.00 retainers. Stick a fork in me. My family left me a resource , hard worked for , so that I wouldn’t need to be cared for by the State Of California, before going on to be with the Lord. I thought us Americans took better care of our own , I would humbley appreciate help. sincerely…………………………………………..Lyndel C. Head…………7-16-11

  • MK

    I wrote The AG K. Harris and explained how I was ripped off by Steve Hertz of Hertz law group.She wrote me back and said”Thank you for your letter but we cannot help individuals.We can only build cases against fraudsters”. WHAT? ANOTHER GOVERMENT JOKE.. JERRY BROWN WAS THE LAST AG JOKE…AND NOW WE HAVE A NEW ONE. Worthless California employees…Stand up for a news opp and lie to everyone for political points.Just keep feeding the minions more lies and do nothing because you were bought and paid for by the Unions and Mortgage Bankers. Every Californian politician and public employee is a thief and a crook.DON’T BELIEVE THAT THEY WILL HELP ANYONE..

  • William J. Rose

    I lost my home to a false foreclosure in ’99. A double-whammy came when I sued the bank and went to court with all the proof you could possibly have that the loan was current (and not “5 payments behind” as the bank claimed) and the judge never looked at my evidence, blew the case through in one day and slapped ME with a judgement for the bank’s defense!!!!

    To complete the task force, they need to go after the judges who perpetuate/participate in the mortgage fraud process. Like Judge John Meyer, Dept. 61, San Diego Superior Court. He’s still on the bench…..I’m homeless.

  • http://bradandjessie1970.blogspot.com/ Jessica

    ….Waiting to see which huge international corporations will be investigated and which millionaire CEO’s will be prosecuted… Seeing is Believing !! Check out my blog : it’s about real estate investment groups and their affiliations : http://bradandjessie1970.blogspot.com/

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team