Home > Personal Finance > An Anti-Consumer Loophole in Financial Overhaul Law?

Comments 0 Comments

The Dodd-Frank financial reform act, passed last year by Congress, did a lot of things consumer advocates like. It created a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau charged with weeding out deceptive practices in the financial services industry and improving disclosures to consumers on things like mortgages and credit cards. It took power away from the Office of Thrift Supervision, widely seen as having been in the back pocket of failed savings and loans like Washington Mutual, and barred banks from paying kickbacks to loan officers in exchange for ratcheting up the interest rate on mortgages.

But last week we glimpsed a little-known part of the massive law that consumer advocates may not appreciate.  A federal judge in Florida ruled on March 11 that Dodd-Frank can be used to strike down tougher banking laws passed by the states. The case involves Vida Baptista, who went to Chase Bank to cash a check. Baptista does not have any accounts with Chase, so the bank charged her a $6 fee.

[Article: More Roadblocks for New Consumer Protection Agency]

That fee allegedly violates a Florida law banning banks from charging non-bank customers check cashing fees. Baptista filed a class-action lawsuit against Chase on behalf of all the other non-Chase customers who have been charged the fee.

Chase asked the federal court in Florida to dismiss the lawsuit on the basis of federal preemption, arguing that the Dodd-Frank act overrules any state laws about banks or bank fees. Chase won that case, and Baptista appealed.

In his decision, Joel Dubina, chief judge of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, wrote that Florida’s law banning banks from charging fees to non-customers “is in substantial conflict” with Dodd-Frank. And in that case, federal law wins.

The decision may not settle the preemption argument, as cases in other states raise similar challenges to bank fees, and allege that the fees violate state laws.

“It’s probably the first word, but not the last word on the subject,” Laurence Hutt, a partner at Arnold & Porter, told American Banker.

[Featured Product: Research and Compare Secured Credit Card Offers on Credit.com]

Image: Thomas Münter, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team