Home > Identity Theft > The FTC and the Future of Privacy Enforcement in America

Comments 0 Comments

ID911dreamstime_10543489

The Federal Trade Commission is taking its role as America’s privacy and data protection authority more seriously than ever.

Fresh on the heels of its new-era privacy manifesto, which lays out its evolving expectations around the intersection of privacy and business, the FTC secured a settlement with three credit report resellers that failed to protect consumers’ personal information when hackers gained access to more than 1,800 credit reports.

“The FTC will take action against companies that cross the line with consumer data and violate consumers’ privacy … I think you’ll see more privacy cases in the coming weeks and months,” said Jon Leibowitz, FTC chairman, when the privacy report was released.

[Article: What Does Privacy Even Mean These Days?]

The resellers bought credit reports from the three nationwide credit-reporting bureaus and combined them into reports for sale to mortgage brokers. The FTC said the resellers failed to:

• Develop and disseminate information security policies for their own institutions and their end user clients;

• Assess the risks of allowing end users with unverified or inadequate security to access consumer reports through their portals;

• Evaluate the security of end users’ computer networks, require appropriate information security measures, and train end user clients;

• Implement reasonable steps to maintain an effective system for monitoring end users’ access to consumer reports, including monitoring to detect anomalies and other suspicious activity; and

• Take appropriate action to correct existing vulnerabilities or threats to personal information in light of known risks.

These failures resulted in the exposure of consumer information to a number of groups and individuals without the authority to access it, including hackers.

What’s interesting about these complaints was their uniformity. In fact they were nearly identical. From my perspective this shows a systemic problem within the industry, one that is general enough for a “form complaint” approach by the FTC.

[Article: The Epsilon Breach: Don’t Take the Bait With Phishing Scams]

What I find most interesting, though, is the fact that there isn’t much that’s interesting here. The nature of the complaints and issues in the cases don’t stand out; these are not “groundbreaking privacy enforcement cases.” They are common privacy related complaints around improperly protecting access to consumer data.

Interestingly too, the punishment is also becoming the norm: 20 years of biannual third-party audits that check for proper processes and procedures to correct and improve the protection of sensitive data. This “life sentence” (as I refer to it) for privacy violations begins to drive home the seriousness of these issues in the eyes of the FTC.

If anything, the vanilla nature of these complaints clearly lays out that companies still aren’t doing enough to protect access to consumer information, and that there is no shortage of this type of lax behavior in any industry. The FTC will just keep chipping away at consumer-oriented privacy abuses, one case—or maybe three cases—at a time.

Image: © Kheng Ho Toh | Dreamstime.com


A version of this article originally appeared on Identity Theft 911 on April 15, 2011.


More from Identity Theft 911:

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team