Home > 2011 > Managing Debt

Pre-Paid Debt Settlement, Rest in Peace

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 3 Comments

One nearly dead, one dying fast. For consumers looking for low-cost ways to borrow money and get out of debt, the downfall of two entire industries may actually be good news, consumer advocates say.

The first lending industry on the ropes was tax anticipation loans. A series of regulatory changes could make 2011 the last year that companies can offer loans based on tax returns, which we covered here. Now the pre-paid debt settlement industry may be entering its final days, insiders say.

A rule imposed in October 2010 by the Federal Trade Commission banned companies from charging money up-front before doing any work to resolve a consumer’s outstanding debts.

[Resource: Tips for Paying Off Credit Card Debt]

That single rule change has caused membership in The Association of Settlement Companies (TASC) to plummet 70% in the last six months, says Eric Thompson, founder of Denver-based Prestige Financial Services, which switched from a pre-paid to pay-as-you-go model two years ago. Thompson began tracking the number of members listed on the TASC web site soon before the rule took effect.

While he didn’t confirm the exact numbers, Robert Linderman, vice president of TASC’s board of directors, says, “It’s a good approximation. And we don’t view that necessarily as a negative.”

According to Linderman, the huge reduction in TASC’s membership was partly due to the fact that the association now only accepts companies that follow the FTC’s rule by charging only after they actually resolve a debt.

“We want the industry to become much more respectable, to be recognized for the incredible value we provide to consumers,” says Linderman, who says the industry’s internal research finds that it resolved $1 billion worth of unpaid debts in 2010 and saved consumers between $400 and $500 million.

Some companies changed voluntarily, before the FTC rule took effect.

“We saw the writing on the wall,” says Thompson of Prestige Financial Services. He agrees with Linderman’s assessment about changes in the industry. “You’re taking delicate consumers and charging them money and not even providing a service. When you can eliminate that, I think it’s fantastic.”

[Resource: Consumer Guide to Debt Settlement]

Some companies continue to charge upfront fees by presenting themselves as attorney services, which are not covered under the FTC rule, says Gerri Detweiler, Credit.com’s credit expert. This is a dangerous bait-and-switch, Thompson says, since most companies use an attorney as a frontman but turn the debt reduction work itself over to non-attorneys.

“The industry is definitely being weeded out, and a lot of players who were relying on charging clients big upfront fees are gone,” Detweiler says. “That’s a good thing.”

Legitimate debt reduction services, which charge only after they succeed in reducing a consumer’s debt, still play an important role, Detweiler says. By working with so many consumers, they know which lenders are most willing to negotiate versus those most likely to sue. That’s important information that most people would never know, and it can help consumers know which debts they should settle first.

“And with the FTC rule, it gives the companies more incentive to screen for clients that are good candidates for settlement, so they’re more likely to only take on clients that can be successful,” Detweiler says.

A similar squeeze is hitting the tax anticipation loan industry now, as new regulations by the IRS, FDIC and the Office of Thrift Supervision make it increasingly difficult for companies like Jackson Hewitt and H&R Block to get the capital they need to offer loans, according to a recent report by the National Consumer Law Center and the Consumer Federation of America.

Image: quaziefoto, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Pingback: Debt Settlement Attorneys Might Help Save Somebody Tons Of Cash()

  • James C. Gibbs

    I was one of those people who paid one thousand dollars up front. I was told that they would contact the credit card companies that I owed money and have my interest rate reduced to at least twelve per cent. I said how can you do this and they replied that they had a staff of attorney’s who dealt with this on a daily basis. The only thing that I received was a computer generated booklet that showed how to pay off your debt in an systematic way. The booklet did not address my need. I wrote to them and received a telephone call from them. They would not answer my questions concerning the interest rate reduction that they promised. Toward the end of the conversation they said that they would look at my plan and see what they could do for me. That was four months ago and I haven’t heard from them.

    Their name is Ist Financial Asset Services But the shipping return address was Corporate Fulfillment center, 201 S. Lincoln Ave. Clearwater, Fl. 33756-5821.

  • Anniey Tom

    Availing the service of a debt settlement company entails careful consideration. Moreover, choosing a debt settlement company requires further thinking and cautious research because of 2 reasons:

    — You need to invest your time and effort to a debt settlement company that is both reliable and effective.
    — Scammers and fraudulent debt settlement companies are scattered everywhere.

  • Carol LaMartina

    Hello, I just Quit Morgan Drexen Integrated Legal Sysatems, which supports Levinson Consumer Attorneys. I answered a question from a TV program and they were an offer I could accept. Sorry I did! I was loaned $1,000.00 I did not realize why until I asked how much money was in my account ($O). They got their money up front. I was also paying $50 a month for 11months for a service fee. (pre-paid envelopes). I lost $1650.00, and I still owe them $245. They told me they would not take any more money from my account, but I received a bill with the next draw being 5/3/2011.
    I am also being sued by Chase, how does that happen?
    they were gonna call me and ask for another $151.00 a month to cover the settlement they made with Chase Bank on my behalf. I also read in the contract that they get 25% of the difference between the actual debt and what they settle for. I got hooked. What I was told did not happen and I will be out over $2000.00, and no debt paid, and my husband is working part time, I lost my Health Ins.. I was working with my Disability check only.
    These people are in California, and are now advertising on TV, under Morgn Drexen, said only once. 1600 DOUGLASS ROAD, SUITE 100 ANAHEIM CA. 92806

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team