Home > Personal Finance > Even in Recession, Big Banks Give Big Raises

Comments 0 Comments

The Great Recession hammered finances for millions of Americans. But not the lucky few who work for the nation’s four largest banks. Even in the midst of the recession, these employees continued to receive major pay raises, according to a new report by BankRegData.com, a bank consulting firm.

Four banks in America have assets over $1 trillion: JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo. In 2003, the average employee at a large bank made $70,649—nearly 50% more than their small-bank colleagues.  Today, that same employee makes $96,355—a 36% increase over a seven-year span. Only in 2008, when the Great Recession hit, did Big Four pay rates fail to increase during that seven-year period. Since then, pay raises have increased even faster than they did during the housing boom.

“The biggest banks, they are basically paying themselves $14,000 more per employee now than they were before the crisis,” says Bill Moreland, founder of BankRegData.com. “They have continued to grow at an unbelievably quick rate.”

[Featured tool: Get your free Credit Report Card from Credit.com]

At small banks, with under $99 million in assets, it’s a different story. In contrast to the rate of pay increase of large banks, the average small-bank worker made only 27% more in 2010 than he did in 2003. Much of the that increase is attributable to a need to keep up with rising inflation rates and health care costs, Moreland says. Since 2003, what had been a steady rise in small-bank employees’ annual incomes peaked at $61,720 in 2008, after which incomes held steady or even went down a tad.

It’s not as though large bank employees can claim to be doing a significantly better job than workers at other banks, according to reports by BankRegData.com. A bank’s financial health can be measured by something called the Texas ratio, akin to a credit score for financial institutions. In this measurement, which takes into consideration a bank’s bad assets and its capital and loan loss reserves, a lower score means healthier finances.

The four largest banks have a Texas Ratio of 32.43, more than twice as bad as the 15.09 average boasted by the smallest banks. Big banks also have double the rate of bad, non-performing loans. And they’ve been forced to modify their loans at three times the ratio of small banks.

All of which means that small banks are doing a better job of giving out safe loans and keeping their financial houses in order, Moreland says, even though their employees make far less than workers at big banks.

Image: Andrew Magill, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team