Home > 2011 > Identity Theft

Disney Employee Cards Ripe For Rip-Off

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 1 Comment

Walt Disney employees aren’t wishing on a star these days—they’re wishing their employee I.D. cards didn’t have their Social Security numbers embedded in them. With staffers at risk for identity theft, Disney’s CEO says they will send the problem—and the cards—off to never-never land.

The affected employee I.D. cards, which include Disney president Bob Iger’s card, include bar codes that can be read by smart phones and other mobile technology devices. Certain phones like the iPhone and the Android offer special applications that can scan the bar codes and break down the codes and reveal personal employee data.

[Resource: Understand your exposure to Identity theft with the Identity Risk Score]

Disney employees are so ticked off by the bar code gaffe (the cards were created well before the smart phone technology that exposed these cards were available) that they’re now filing a class action suit in California. The lawsuit contends that employees have complained to Disney management about the cards, and the employees’ vulnerability to identity theft, for three years. But management has yet to rectify the situation.

The lawsuit also claims that posting Social Security numbers on employee I.D. cards is against the law in California. Disney is trying to take a diplomatic stance on the case, not admitting to any fault but stating that the company will issue new cards—sans Social Security data—just the same.

“We disagree with the legal premise of the lawsuit,” said Suzi Brown, in a statement to the Orange County Register. “Protecting cast members’ (employees) personal information is a responsibility we take very seriously. ”

CEO Iger says that the problem is being addressed. He told an audience of shareholders in Salt Lake City recently that employee card changes are a big priority. “We are addressing this issue. This issue will be completely fixed. We’re trying to do it as quickly as possible,” Iger told the group.

[Resource: 12 Tips for Protecting Your Identity]

But one Disney employee spokesperson says that Disney’s response is too little, too late. “It’s obvious they don’t see it as a serious issue,” Jorge Iniestra, a bellman at the Disneyland Hotel, and a lead plaintiff, told the Orange County Register.

The lawsuit might come down to what a judge considers to be an actual Social Security number. Clearly, the California state code says that employees can’t print Social Security numbers on employee cards. But the Disney cards have Social Security numbers that are encoded, and that could be a legal sticking point.

So far, no clear reports of identity theft have been reported from Disney employees—at least not related to their cards. But staffers aren’t taking any chances—they want their cards protected now, before any cyber-pirates take their personal data—and potentially their bank account—to the Caribbean.

Image by Stuck in Customs, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://creditwise.com.au credit code legal advice

    I haven’t heard about the I.D. cards which include bar codes that can be read by smart phones and other mobile technology devices. its really wonderful…..great technology..

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team