Home > Identity Theft > Beginning of the End for Online Passwords?

Comments 2 Comments

YourPasswordHas_Eric_Schmuttenmaer_CCFlickrHow many websites do you currently visit that require you to log in with a username and password? Five? Dozens? And how many times do you type the same password into many different sites? If you’re like most people, you probably don’t invent an entirely new password for each site. How could you possibly remember them all?

This is just one way in which the current system of online security is broken, according to the Obama administration. Now the Commerce Department has a roadmap for figuring out how to fix it. The department recently released a “National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace,” and it’s intended to bring new levels of trust to online commerce.

“The fact is that the ‘old’ password and user-name combination we often use to verify people is no longer good enough.  It leaves too many consumers, government agencies and businesses vulnerable to ID and data theft,” Commerce Secretary Gary Locke said in a press conference. “This is why the Internet still faces something of a ‘trust’ issue.  And it will not reach its full potential—commercial or otherwise—until users and consumers feel more secure than they do today when they go online.”

[Article: The Epsilon Breach: Don’t Take the Bait With Phishing Scams]

The administration’s plan veers away from the model implemented in some European countries, in which a government agency hands out identification numbers that people can use online. That “creates unacceptable privacy and civil liberties issues,” Locke said.

Instead, the department wants private companies to come up with a system of “identity credentials” stored on smart cards or cell phones. Consumers could plug the cards or phones into computers to check their bank accounts, make online purchases or log in to email accounts.

The administration hopes that better authentication of online users could help reduce the number of people defrauded online. Last year 8.1 million Americans were victims of identity theft or fraud last year, costing them $37 billion, according to the Commerce Department.

[Fraud Resource: Free Identity Risk Score and personal risk profile]

Image: Eric Schmuttenmaer, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Christopher

    Here’s how you set up a “nearly” unique password for each site:

    Select 2-3 characters from the site’s address, ALWAYS using the characters from the same position. For example, for credit.com you could use “ed” and for google.com you could use “og”.

    Select 5-6 characters that mean something to you, like G00se.

    Select a short, easy to remember sentence, like “Ilikeapples?”

    Mash them together: edG00seIlikeapples? for credit.com, and ogG00seIlikeapples? for google. This gives you a nearly different, yet easily remembered, password for every site. Make sure you include numbers and special characters. Not every site will take the entire password, but you’ll learn where to stop for each site.

  • http://www.mycloudkey.com Gurudatt

    There are many online password managers which perform this role of having a master password that generates unique passwords for different websites.

    However, if someone hacks your master password all your other websites will also be hacked.

    If the master password is locked to a device the user uses to sign in, then it will be more difficult for someone to hack it.

    Such a solution is available with MyCloudKey.com

  • Pingback: >La contraseña perfecta « LA FOTO OLVIDADA DE AYER()

  • Pingback: Beginning of the End for Online Passwords? - Identity Theft 911 Blog()

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team