Home > 2011 > Credit Score

The Politics of the Credit Score

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 4 Comments

There has been a lot of activity in Washington over the past couple of years to propose, revise and enact rules that increase consumer access to credit scores that lenders use when setting loan terms and making a decision on whether to grant or deny a consumer request for credit.  On the whole, this is good news for consumers because it provides additional transparency around the credit evaluation process—as well as access to the actual credit score the lender used to decide whether or not to accept or deny the application.

As with most regulations, the devil is in the details and the rules are being finalized as we speak. In addition, it can also be quite confusing with all the different rules and different governmental agencies proposing and enforcing the rules—as evidenced in the proposed credit score disclosure rules released last week by the Federal Reserve and FTC.  These proposed rules relate to credit score disclosure within the context of adverse action and risk-based pricing notifications. Stay with me, I’ll explain what these two terms mean in English.

I’ve received a lot of questions about who does what, by when and how it impacts all of us as consumers. Hopefully this explanation will help you navigate through this regulatory maze as it evolves!

Credit Score Disclosure Within Adverse Action Notification

Simply put, when you get denied credit the lender needs to notify you with an explanation of why you were denied and instructions on how to access a free copy of your credit report from the credit reporting agency they used to make their decision.

A bit more detailed explanation: when a lender denies an applicant’s request for credit—and if they base their adverse decision using the applicant’s credit bureau report—the lender is required to notify the consumer of that decision as governed by the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and by the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) and Regulation B.

[Featured Tool: Get your free Credit Report Card from Credit.com]

The notice provides the lender’s name and address, a statement of the action taken, a list of the principle and specific reasons for the adverse action, and the ECOA notice.  It also includes: A statement that the credit report was used in taking adverse action; the name, address and telephone number of the credit reporting company; a statement that the consumer has a right to a copy of their credit report and to dispute the accuracy of information in the report; and a statement that the credit bureau did not participate in and cannot explain the credit decision.

So where’s the credit score?

Currently, the lender is not obligated to disclose any credit score within the adverse action notification.  That is likely going to change this year.

The Dodd-Frank Act amends the FCRA to require lenders that use credit scores to include those scores and related information in adverse action notices provided to consumers in addition to what is already required in adverse action notices.  This past week, the Federal Reserve proposed new rules to implement this provision and provides new credit score disclosure language for the adverse action notices. When a lender takes adverse action based on information contained in a consumer’s credit report, the lender must provide to the consumer:

  • The credit score used in taking the adverse action.
  • The range of possible scores under the model used.
  • The top factors or reasons that caused the credit score to be low—which should be ranked in order of their importance (should not exceed 4 factors—unless the # of credit inquiries is a factor and is not already reflected in the top 4).
  • The date on which the credit score was created.
  • The name of the credit reporting agency that provided the credit score.

I am encouraged that the proposed rules include not just disclosing the credit score, but also includes the top factors on why that credit score was not higher.  By providing the top factors, consumers will now have access to the main reasons why their score was not higher and can focus their activities on those areas to help increase their score over time.

Credit Score Disclosure Within Risk-Based Pricing Notification »

Image by cannonsnapper, via Flickr

Pages: 1 2

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team