Home > Mortgages > The Mortgage Maze: Why Loans Will Be More Expensive

Comments 1 Comment

Maze_Peter_Shanks_CCFlickrIn a word, “Government.”

Governments make rules. Rules are made to be followed, not to be broken. When you have rules, you need people to check to ensure they are followed.

Now, it is quite clear that when Congress passed new laws, and various regulatory bodies like HUD and the Federal Reserve Board passed new regulations to put those laws into effect, no one allocated money to pay for their enforcement. It’s as if they passed speed limit laws but didn’t set aside cash to hire police.  The expanding roster of guidelines has created a more complicated process and given rise to added fees—and this means the consumer pays for it all in the end.  Let me illustrate…

More hands in the process

At this point, everyone is basically relying on the lenders to make sure all rules are followed. Lenders have indeed added people to their payroll, and passed the cost on to borrowers by way of slightly higher prices.

In the old days, mortgage brokers like myself would submit a file to a lender, it would get logged in, be assigned a loan number, and immediately wind up on an underwriter’s desk. In a day or two, maybe three, it would get underwritten and maybe I would be asked for something more. But a day after that, it went to the document drawer. When the docs were signed by the borrowers, the file would go to a loan funder. That process involved four people and typically took less than a week.

[Infographic: Why the Home Loan Mod Program is Failing]

Today, every file that goes to a lender is touched by as many as ten people—and not all of them appear to be beneficial to the process. There is a “set-up” person who creates a file in the system, even though we did it when we registered it online. It goes to a compliance person who assures that the Good Faith Estimate and Truth-in-Lending forms are in order—the compliance person doesn’t actually look at the rate or fees proposed or anything else that’s important. There are four date boxes on the GFE and they make sure the dates are filled in correctly. I could say I was charging 10 points on a loan and they wouldn’t notice, so long as the dates are right.

I know that doesn’t add up to ten people, but we get e-mails from other people giving us progress reports or asking for more information. Also, they are typically the lowest-paid people in the office. It’s silly to pretend that they understand the GFE law, but they can see if the right dates are in the boxes.

The underwriters all now have assistants and I’m not sure what they do as I don’t see them, but they are there. The document drawing function is about the same but now the funders seem to have assistants as well, and it seems as if they re-underwrite the file. We had a loan ready to fund and they had 13 extra conditions that we needed to get prior to funding.

In almost every case, they are checking for insignificant items, not important things like the appraisal, income and asset documentation, or credit. They check everything except the big things.

Next: A labyrinth of rules »

Pages: 1 2

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.xomba.com/how_and_where_can_you_get_credit_bad_credit Bad Credit

    The problem I have is that the biggest factor keeping the economy from gaining in strength, allowing the real estate market to come back and allowing jobs to be created by busieness rather than government is that these banks won’t lend out any money to anybody.

    It doesn’t matter if you have good credit or not they just simply will not lend out money. They are closing credit lines and causing businesses to fail. They are calling in loans that are in great standing and despite government handouts are doing nothing but bringing down our economy.

    I’m a very frustrated business man about to lose everything simply because of this new attitude with our lending institutions.


Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team