Home > Credit Score > Credit Score Reason Codes: What They Mean and Why You Should Care

Comments 12 Comments

While knowing your credit score is important, understanding the context of where your score resides within the overall score range, and having insight into why it’s not higher, empowers you to focus on score improvement strategies that will help you successfully increase your credit score and gain access to better credit terms—which ultimately saves you money.

When a credit score is generated, there are a series of credit related questions being asked by the scoring model, and the answers for each question will depend on the information (or data) being reported in your credit report. Points for each answer to each question are assigned and the sum of these points is generated to create your credit score.

Let’s take a look at the made up example scorecard below and the associated scores for Jane and Bob.  The information highlighted in blue represents the points assigned for each credit question based on information reported in their credit reports:

After the score is calculated, score reason codes are generated along with the score – both of which are provided to the lender who requested the credit report. If the lender denies the request for credit, they will often incorporate these reason codes into the adverse action letter they are obligated to provide to you in order to help explain why the credit request was denied.  These reason codes are also frequently included within the score explanation section when you purchase access to your personal credit report and score.

[Featured Tool: Get your free Credit Report Card from Credit.com]

These reason codes indicate the main reasons why your credit score was not higher and are returned with the score in order of importance–with the first code indicating where the consumer lost the most points, or the primary reason why the score wasn’t higher, the second being the secondary reason, and so on.

Now, let’s calculate the top reasons why Bob’s score wasn’t higher.  We do this by simply subtracting the total number of points Bob received from the maximum number of points available for each “question” in the scorecard:

These are then sorted in order of impact of where the greatest number of points were lost.  For Bob, the following credit score and score reason codes would be returned as:

Bob’s Credit Score = 50

Top reasons why Bob’s score was not higher:

  • Time since most recent missed payment too recent
  • Too many new accounts recently opened
  • Too many accounts with a balance

With this information, Bob is able to understand what credit behaviors had the most substantial impact on his score and where he needs to currently focus his efforts in order to improve his score.

[Related Article: The Politics of the Credit Score]

Up to four reason codes are returned with each score generated by the credit reporting agency.  In some cases, a fifth reason code is provided, but only if the # of credit inquiries is a factor that affected your score—but was not already in the top four reasons.  Even people with really high scores—say a 790 or higher—may return reason codes with their score. This simply represents areas where the high scoring person just missed earning the maximum number of points available for that particular data element.

Now that we’ve determined Bob’s reason codes, how many reason codes would Jane’s score produce? Know the answer?  Share them in the comments section below.

Image by Stewf, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Christopher

    This article doesn’t make much sense. Why would someone be penalized more if their late payments were older? The chart shows a late payment in the last year gives you 25 points, but it if was 3-7 years old you only get 5. Also, Bob’s credit score is initially listed as 50, but it later is shown as 115.

  • Credit.com

    We were testing to see if anyone would catch that. (j/k) Actually, we’d like to thank you for catching the discrepancy. When we created the chart, we inadvertently transposed the 1 year and the 3-7 year points. We’ve corrected the chart to reflect the actual scale that Tom intended. And for the record, you’re right on the money — a late payment point penalty would be much higher at the 1 year mark than it would be at the 3-7 year mark. Nice catch!

    Thanks again, Christopher!

  • Howell

    I just checked my scores the high one was 761 then I filled out a credit app for a condo the bank pulled my scores and came up with the highest at 716 and the next score at 686 why the big difference long standing credit no lates only about 38% of my credit used I have 3 tax leins that have been cleared 8 months ago #2? how do I get 3 off my report without wating 7 years

  • Richard Harris

    I applied for a credit card through my credit union & they approved it. They sent me a letter “Your Credit Score and Understanding Your Credit Score” They got the score from Experian, which was just under 690 & under the subheading was “Key factors that adversely affected your credit score”. They listed 4 entries, (1) Proportion of balance to credit limit is too high on revolving account. (2) Too many recent inquiries in the last 12 months. (3) Too many consumer finance company accounts. (4) Lack of recent bank revolving accounts. On factor #3. my question is what formula is used to determine this entry, does the formula lump all accounts into one regardless if they are paid off or not? Does their formula differentitate between open & closed accounts? The Experian credit report that I received dated 01/03/2012, list all but 5 accounts as ACCOUNTS IN GOOD STANDING. So, if the 20 closed accounts PAIDCLOSED/NEVERLATE, are too many how can they be classified as accounts in good standing? Currently I have 5 open accounts 1. Mortgage 2. Car loan 3. Personel loan, 4&5 Credit cards. These 5 accounts are in good standing & paid on time with no late payments. I have 20 closed accounts, 19 closed accounts marked on the credit report as PAIDCLOSEDNEVERLATE. & 1 account marked as CLOSED AT CONSUMERS REQUEST. Also for your information I submit to you the following: delinquent accounts:0, derogatory accounts:0 & public records:0. Reference factor & 4, I have no idea what this means or how it impacts my credit score. Can you tell me how I can challage factors 3 & 4? What allows Experian to put remarks like the ones I have mentioned, to the creditor & then in turn to me, without further explanation? What recourse do I have? I can’t afford a lawyer, so I am sending this message to you in hopes that you can help me. Thanking you in advance.

    • http://www.credit.com Barry Paperno

      I agree those reason codes that are returned with the FICO scores are pretty cryptic. Unfortunately, we’re not able to provide those reason codes with your Credit.com score, since they’re not FICO scores (which your lender is using, so be aware of the differences). And since I’m not aware of any good “translations” out there, so I’ll do my best to interpret for you:
      • #3 – Too many consumer finance company accounts: these are personal installment-type loans made by a “consumer finance company,” and often result from financing furniture, appliances, etc. through a 3rd party financing company. Such lenders often lend to people with less-than-stellar credit, and as such, FICO’s research into consumer behavior found that people with these accounts on their credit reports tend to be more likely to default on at least one credit obligation than those who don’t. Specifically, this reason means that any number of consumer finance company accounts – even just one! – can be “too many” to receive the most possible points for the score factor(s) that considers “consumer finance accounts.” And, it doesn’t matter if the loan is open or closed, only that it’s on your credit report. The good news, however, is that this factor carries very little weight in your score. So, while I would recommend not using one of these lenders unless you really have to, I also wouldn’t worry about the effect this factor is having on your score, especially since there’s nothing you can do about it — other than continue paying on time (if it hasn’t been paid off already). The first reason listed should be your #1 concern.
      • #4 – Lack of recent bank revolving accounts. The idea here is the scoring formula wants to see that you use credit cards, which is much better than NOT using them, and that you do so responsibly. This reason code is listed here to point out that you don’t have any “recent” experience with credit cards, as shown by the lack of revolving (credit cards) accounts reporting balances. (It also could mean that you bought something and paid it off before your statement date) Apparently, according to #1, you must have some non-bankcard revolving accounts (retail?) that are at or close to their limits? I’m just guessing, since I can’t see your credit report, but you have some kind of revolving debt, even if no credit card balances. In addition to paying down some of those revolving balances, you can probably help your score by using at least one of your bankcards each month and paying it off by the next due date. This will cause a balance to show, and demonstrates activity, while showing the scoring formula you are able to use bankcards “responsibly.”.

      Let us know if you need any more help understanding these reason codes or if you have any other questions. (I know this stuff sounds crazy, but….) Good luck!

  • Richard Harris

    I went to credit.com & received a print-out of my score & overall ratings. The score was still under 690 and the ratings were A+payment history, C- debt usage, A credit age, A account mix, D inquiries, but I did not find credit score reason codes & what they mean. Could one of your credit or finance gurus help me out & tell me where I can get these credit score reason codes that Experian uses? I am trying to challage the Experian as to why they use partial sentences(without further explanation) when they report back to my creditor with “factors” that are not understandable, as in “Lack of recent bank revolving information: or “Too many consumer finance company accounts:. In order to better manage my credit, it is really hard to do when Experian puts half statements to my creditor that only they understand what it means. I believe that Experian should explain to me, in detail, what these coded half sentences mean. What do I have to do to get this information?

    • http://www.credit.com Barry Paperno

      While your request for these reason codes certainly sounds reasonable, they’re only delivered with FICO credit scores. The score you received from Credit.com is a Scorex Plus score, not a FICO. And since Experian doesn’t make it’s FICO scores available to consumers, you’re going to be out of luck trying to get your Experian FICO score or reason codes. The ones you saw must have been provided by your broker/lender? Hopefully, my reply above will help understand the reason codes you received. Let us know if you have any more questions.

  • http://BarryPaperno Richard Harris

    Thank you so much for your answer, it really did help me to understand what the credit bureau does & how they operate. My two credit cards are just issued cards, so they really no payment history, except for the first two months. My plan to correct the remarks is to make a purchase each month & send in a larger payment than requested on the two credit cards, & not to request any inquiries for a year. At the end of the year, June 2013, the remark “Too many recent inquiries in the last 12 months, should be gone, as well as the remark”Lack of recent bank revolving information”, because I will have made purchases & payments on both credit cards. This will hopefully eliminate remark #1 and at the end of one year, also raise my credit score. Thanking you again for helping me out in this matter.

    • http://www.credit.com Barry Paperno

      Charging occasionally on the two cards, making larger than minimum payments – or ideally the entire balances – and refraining from applying for new credit, which will prevent any new inquiries, is a great plan! Best of luck!

  • Bernice Hagan

    My credit score is great except it had one area as C because I take a lot of card offers. I get free nights, gift cards, miles, etc. Now I would like to get rid of the cards that are not the best. I don’t think I care about my credit for awhile since I am retired, have bought a car recently- have no big purchases in mind. People say it hurts to cancel these. Should I? I have two which will charge an annual fee soon so I don’t want these anymore.

  • Harry Tolle

    The posted comments and replies have helped me a lot. I have just started trying to get Experian to explain their adverse comments on a credit report they provided to a mortgage company. My score was over 800 but the comments made me sound like a serious credit risk. When I talked to them they tried to blame the printed comments on the mortgage company caliming that Experian did not provide them. There does not seem to be any regulatory agency that can hold them responsible for what are obviously derogatory and damaging comments.

    • Credit.com

      Harry – The reason codes (or adverse comments) were generated by the credit scoring model the lender used. Since it was a mortgage, I’m going to assume it was a FICO score. Prior to 2001, when FICO first released their credit scores to the public, they were only provided to lenders. And to help lenders understand the main factors behind the score, the scoring models generated these reason codes or score factors to help the lender pinpoint why the score wasn’t higher (it also helped the lender explain to the consumer why the score wasn’t higher.) Here’s the thing, because your score is SO hight (an 800 FICO score is like the best of the best) — these codes won’t make sense or mean anything whatsoever to you. This is because all scores are designed to return “reason codes” that explain where the consumer lost points in the scoring model. These reason codes or score factors are more helpful to consumers with lower scores. However, because the model is designed to return these factors– no matter how high the score, they really don’t carry much weight with folks that score as high as you do. This is why they don’t make sense to you. Even though you think the reason codes made you sound like a serious credit risk, your lender probably told you that your credit was excellent — the fact that you had an 800 was golden.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team