Home > Mortgages > Big Banks Girding for Big Foreclosure Fines

Comments 2 Comments

PenCollection_Ryan_Leighty_FlickrThe nation’s largest banks expect to pay billions of dollars in fines and legal bills as a result of a 50-state investigation into foreclosure paperwork problems arising from the “robo-signer” scandal. Annual reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Bank of America stated that the investigation could cost each company well over $1 billion.

The probe comes after widespread allegations that the banks and their loan servicing subsidiaries foreclosed on homeowners without having the documents necessary to make the foreclosures legal. Attorneys general and bank regulators in all 50 states are pursuing a joint investigation into possible wrongdoing.

[Related article: Robo-Signers and the Business of Foreclosures]

The investigation may result in as much as $20 billion in fines, according to anonymous sources quoted by Bloomberg News.

“With regard to the investigations into foreclosure practices, it is likely that one or more of the government agencies will initiate some type of enforcement action against Wells Fargo, which may include civil money penalties,” the bank said in its 2010 annual report to the SEC.

That could cost Wells Fargo $1.2 billion, according to the bank’s filing. In addition, the bank said it is facing seven class-action lawsuits, plus numerous suits from individual borrowers, which could cost the bank as much as $1.2 billion.

At Citigroup, fines and legal bills of $4 billion are “possible,” the company said. The investigation could cost Bank of America $1.5 billion, including “significant legal costs,” the company said in its report.

Image: Ryan Leighty, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Leticia Najera

    Thank you for article. I live in Whittier, Calif. with husband, 2 daughters and grandchildren. I am in active foreclosure with Wells Fargo. I have been struggling with bank for over a year. Basically bank is closing each possibility to modify. I believe bank sees by home being “better business’ for them to foreclosure rather than modifying negative amortization, deferred interest loan that I without knowing acquired. I am asking bank to add to my loan what I owe and change my loan to what is morally right. I am waiting but feel they again will deny me ( I have provided financial showing I am employed and by husband just became employed after rough year.) Reason for denial is banks (NPV) net present value “equity in my home.” For me it is not the “equity that counts they can add what I owe, It is “our family home.” Why should large institution cash in on “our home.” please if you can help us fight to keep our home! “our American Dream” Sincerely Leticia Najera 562-572-8963.

  • Christopher Maag

    Wow, thank you for your note, Leticia! I’m very sorry to hear that you’re having such troubles! Many people have said the same thing, that banks and their loan servicers are not modifying loans for the vas majority of people who request modification.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team