Home > 2011 > Mortgages

Wikileaks Ally Leaks Bank of America Documents

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 2 Comments

BofAClock_Taber_Andrew_Bain_CCFlickrAfter months of anticipation about a trove of documents that could shake giant Bank of America to its knees, the hacker organization Anonymous released e-mails to the public Monday its members say prove that employees of a Bank of America-owned company committed mortgage fraud in a number of foreclosures.

But so far, anyway, the e-mails released by Anonymous seem to prove little, at least on their own. Bank of America played down the release, made by a former employee, saying that the leaked e-mails don’t even relate to foreclosures.

“We are confident that his extravagant assertions are untrue,” a bank spokesman told Reuters on Sunday.

[Article: Two States Charge Bank of America With Fraud]

The former employee worked for Balboa Insurance, which was bought by Bank of America in 2008. Balboa sells force-placed mortgage insurance, in which a homeowner who does not buy insurance has it bought for them by the servicer of their mortgage, with the premiums added automatically to their monthly bill.

The e-mails released Monday are between Balboa employees discussing plans to delete loan numbers from documents “so the documents will not show as matched to those loans,” one employee wrote.

You can see the e-mails at bankofamericasuck.com. The website appears to be crashing regularly, however, perhaps due to overwhelming by traffic. The former employee alleges that deleting the loan numbers was part of effort of “knowingly hiding foreclosure information from federal auditors,” and “falsifying loan documentation in order to proceed with foreclosures….”

[Credit Card Q&A: Where Can I Get My Credit Scores for Free?]

The e-mails themselves do not provide enough context to justify these claims.

In 2010 Julian Assange, founder of website Wikileaks, announced he possessed documents that would bring down a major American bank. In another statement he said he had internal documents belonging to Bank of America. Though some people are involved with both WikiLeaks and Anonymous, the two groups appear to be separate, and it was not immediately clear Monday whether the e-mails released regarding Balboa were the same ones Assange alluded to last year, or whether Wikileaks has other documents it plans to release.

Image: Taber Andrew Bain, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Besieged

    Wikileaks is a not a hacker website.

  • http://credit.comnews Aida figueroa

    Bank of America is taking the american dream, I have tried to work a modification with bank of america and they never get the paper work ,one day i receieved letter saying they are working on it, then days later a i received a letter , we dont qualify. last excuse was that we where over $38.00 per month.Who is going to stop the abuse of these monsters.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team