Home > Credit Score > Should Credit Checks By Employers Be Banned? Survey Says Yes.

Comments 2 Comments

In September 2010, then-California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill that would have significantly restricted the use of credit checks by employers in California. If the same bill were put before the American people, though, more than half of them would have likely signed it into law. According to a recent Credit.com survey, the majority of Americans approve of the idea of banning the use of credit reports for employment screening.

In a January 2011 Credit.com survey conducted by GfK Roper, 1000 consumers were asked:

Employers have the right, with your permission, to check your credit report as part of background screening for employment. A number of lawmakers are interested in banning this practice – do you…

– Agree with a proposed ban on this practice?
– Or, are you OK with allowing this practice to continue?

More than half (53.5%) said they agreed with a proposed ban, with slightly more women than men in agreement (55% as opposed to 51.7%) — 39.3% stated they were OK with employers using credit reports to screen job applicants, and 8.2% said they didn’t know.

According to a Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) survey of its members, 60% perform some type of credit report screening on job candidates, but only 13% check the credit of all job candidates.

[Related: Employer Credit Reports: What You Should Know]

Credit checks by employers have become a hot button issue. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 33 bills in 18 states and the District of Columbia were introduced in the 2010 legislative session to restrict the use of credit reports by employers.  While most were defeated, two became law, and could serve as a model for other federal legislation:

Illinois: Beginning January 1, 2011, the Illinois Employee Credit Privacy Act prevents employers in that state from reviewing job applicants’ or employees’ credit reports, except in specific circumstances such as jobs that provide access to personal, financial or confidential information, trade secrets, or state or national security information.

Oregon: A law passed in 2010 prohibits employment discrimination by employers on the basis of information contained in a worker’s credit history, with exceptions, including permission to use that information when it is “substantially job-related.”

Are you worried that your credit could cost you a job you need to pay your bills? Here are some tips:

  • Review your reports. If you are job hunting, make sure you at least know what’s in your credit reports. Visit AnnualCreditReport.com to get copies of your credit reports from all three major credit reporting agencies. If you are unemployed, you are entitled to an additional free copy of your credit report. Follow these instructions.  Then use Credit.com’s free Credit Report Card to help you understand what that information means. (Keep in mind, employers do not get or use credit scores.)
  • Be proactive. Under federal law, employers must get an employee or applicant’s specific written permission before obtaining his or her credit report. If you know there are problems, provide an explanation with your application. Many employers say they would rather a candidate be upfront about problems than hide them.
  • Monitor your credit. Wonder whether an employer is checking your credit? Monitor your credit reports. Anytime your credit information is obtained by a third party, an “inquiry” will appear on your credit report. Just remember that the name of the company inquiring may be different than that of the prospective employer, since many use third-party background screening services.

[Product Spotlight: Get all 3 Credit Reports with Equifax’s 3-in-1 Monitoring with Credit Score]

Weigh In! If you believe your credit has kept you from getting a job, share your story in the comments section below. Or maybe you’re an employer and you’ve found credit reports helpful when screening applicants. We’d like to hear from you.

This national RDD Probability Sample telephone poll was conducted for Credit.com by GfK Custom Research North America from January 14-16, 2011. A total of 1,004 interviews were completed, with roughly 531 female adults and 473 male adults. The margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points for the full sample.

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.ESRcheck.com Les Rosen

    The survey may have been much more useful if the question would have clarified that a person�s credit score is NOT used for employment. Most consumers do not realize that when used for employment, there is a special version of the credit report that does NOT have information such as the applicant�s age or credit score. For more information on how and why employers use credit reports, and how applicants can protect themselves, there is an interesting whitepaper on the topic a the web site for the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS) at http://www.napbs.com/files/public/Consumer_Education/Credit_Reports_for_Background_Screening.pdf

  • Pingback: EMPLOYMENT SCREENING RESOURCES (ESR) NEWS » Survey Reveals More than Half of Consumers Want to Ban Credit Report Checks by Employers()

  • Pingback: Credit Checks for Employment: Ban on Credit Checks? | Background Checks()

  • Pingback: Will Bad Credit Keep You from Getting Hired? - CBS MoneyWatch.com()

  • Pingback: Financial Impact Factor Radio: 02.11.11 « Financial Impact Factor Radio()

  • Pingback: Memo to Obama: Push for Jobs, Don’t Shove Employers : News, Opinion, Truth & YOU!()

  • Pingback: Financial Impact Factor Radio with Paul Petillo, Dave Kittredge and Dave Ng: The Gerri Detweiler Interview - Financial Impact Factor Radio()

  • Sheila Coleman

    I wrote the following letter to these representatives.

    “Representative William McGee
    District 75
    William.Mcgee@ncleg.net
    North Carolina House of Representatives
    300 North Salisbury Street, Room 634
    Raleigh, NC 27603-5925
    919-733-5747

    Senator Linda Garrou
    District 32
    linda.garrou@ncleg.net
    North Carolina Senate
    300 North Salisbury Street, Room 620
    Raleigh, NC 27603-5925
    919-733-5620

    I am writing as directed by Congresswoman, Virginia Foxx to express my concern of employers determining employment by use of credit services and inquiries made to personal credit reports.

    In the past few years, Hawaii, Illinois, Washington and Oregon put limits on pre-employment credit checks; most recently, Maryland adopted a law in April, and Connecticut did in July. These state laws contain exceptions — they may not apply to certain kinds of companies, like banks, or when an employer can show that the credit check is legitimately job-related. Read more: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2096608,00.html#ixzz233FLJKF4

    Also in reviewing the list provided by http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/banking/use-of-credit-information-in-employment-2010-legis.aspx

    I do NOT see where North Carolina has presented any documents in which to prohibit the use of credit screening for job applicants.

    Last evening I saw a report on the Greensboro WFMY news channel that listed 2,600 CHILDREN without homes. There were almost a thousand in Winston Salem. These are just children.

    Our unemployment is devastating. I, for one have a story to share and I hope you will take the time to read it at least.

    I am a 56 year old female. I raised one daughter as a single parent without the help of her father because in the 80’s if you had a job, you did not qualify for assistance. Attorney fees were among the lowest importance due to the fact we did not qualify for food stamps, we had to eat, or housing assistance, we needed somewhere to live. I worked 2 jobs most of the time.

    I taught myself computer programs where I was able to get a receptionist job. The company allowed me to train myself after work at night where I developed my skills in computer programs.

    I went on to work as an administrative assistant and took on line classes through work to educate myself further.

    In 2009 the company I worked for failed, and was sold and moved and I had no job. I decided to join the unemployed in education and obtained an associates degree in healthcare management technology through a community college with the help of the WIA program. I achieved this program, although difficult, as I had not been to college and had not been in school since 1974. However, while doing this, I was unable to maintain my credit; I had 2 judgments put against me while I was already seeking the help of a credit management firm. Now I have sold my home and paid off the 2 judgments and completed the credit assistance program to help me pay off the debt I had, plus I paid off my car.

    I have further enrolled in another community college to advance the business administration studies to obtain an associates degree in business. With the studies already completed I could enhance my business courses within one year to obtain another degree.

    During all of this, I have applied continuously for a job and have been unable to obtain work other than a part time sales position that I have held since 2010.

    I hardly make enough money to support myself and I cannot afford the little health insurance they provide, however I do maintain dental insurance.

    I have numerous letters of recommendations from previous employers; you can view some of them at http://www.linkedin.com/pub/sheila-coleman/48/898/a15

    Yesterday, I received the second letter of this type.

    “This notice is to advise you that Piedmont Advantage Credit Union is taking the following action with
    respect to your potential or current employment:
    Due to the credit history reported and consistent with Piedmont Advantage Credit Union standards, we
    have chosen not to offer you employment.
    This action is based in whole or in part upon information contained in a consumer report with you
    authorized PACU to obtain in connection with its background investigation of you. This information has
    been considered and is being used by Piedmont Advantage Credit Union in accordance with applicable
    law, including applicable federal and state equal employment opportunity laws and regulations.
    The name, address, and telephone number of the consumer reporting agency that furnished your consumer
    report to Piedmont Advantage Credit Union is:
    Equifax Information Services LLC
    PO Box 740241
    Atlanta, GA 30374-0241
    800-685-1111
    You should note that this consumer reporting agency did not make the decision to take the above-noted
    adverse employment action against you. For this reason, the consumer reporting agency will be unable to
    provide you with the specific reasons why Piedmont Advantage Credit Union decided to pursue this
    adverse employment action.
    Pursuant to section 612 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, you have the right to obtain a free copy of your
    consumer report from the consumer reporting agency, provided that you make your request within 60
    days after receipt of this Notice of Adverse Employment Action. Pursuant to section 611 of the Fair
    Credit Reporting Act, you have the right to dispute the accuracy or completeness of any information
    contained in your consumer report with the consumer reporting agency.
    Piedmont Advantage Credit Union is providing you with this Notice of Adverse Employment Action in
    accordance with the requirements of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
    Sincerely,
    I
    Susan Jones
    Human Resources Coordinator
    http://www.pacu.comI381ON.LibertyStreet.Winston-Salem.NC 27105 I 336-776-1700 I 800-433-7228”

    I find it humiliating. At first glance, you might think I applied for a job at this company, which I did not. Secondly they are notifying someone that I may have already been offered a job by their decision to now not offer me a job based on their credit report findings.

    After all I have struggled, lost my job, obtain an education to better my knowledge, I am sent a letter in such a format from a perfect stranger who has never looked at my job application, spoken to any of my references, nor reviewed my experiences. However she has made her decision to inform someone of my inability to perform the job that she does not even identify that I applied for based on a credit report.

    I ask, in this economical downfall this country has found itself in, why am I not finding you as a representative of this state making an effort to prohibit such unjust hardships on those that have tried to better themselves and only want to return to work in order to be able to give back to the economy in addition to provide themselves with health care.

    I look forward to your response in this matter and thank you for the time you have taken in which to review my request.

  • Pingback: Consumer Credit Counseling Services in California « Debt Consolidation Washington()

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team