Home > 2011 > Mortgages

More Poor Mortgage Processing Issues

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

As the mortgage industry lurches along, it is clear that borrowers are getting very poor service from lenders.  Just because you have a good profile, do not expect that you will be immune to this.

In a recent article I discussed one of the reasons for the poor service borrowers are getting these days was due to the “fear factor” of lenders whose employees are terrified of losing their jobs if they make a mistake and approve a loan that should have been denied.  I do not believe that there is cause for this because I have never heard of an underwriter being fired. More to the point, neither have I never heard of an employee being reprimanded over turning down a good loan.  There’s the rub. The richer you are, the more complicated your file, the higher the fear factor.

It used to be that there was a team spirit between us and the lender’s underwriting and processing departments.  The commonly used phrase was, “No one get’s paid unless a loan funds.”  Boy, were those the old days!  Now lenders look at each file as if we have hidden a hand grenade in it.  If they can’t find it, it will go off and cost them their job.  It is no fun dealing in this atmosphere and I hear the same thing from employees of big banks dealing with their own employees.

Here are a couple of additional items for your consideration.

Back in the old days, we dealt with the wholesale lending divisions of lenders like the same banks that dominate retail mortgage lending, Wells Fargo, BofA, Chase, Citicorp, and GMAC. Instead of dealing directly with us, these intermediary lenders now do business through smaller banks and mortgage banking companies, another intermediary. It possibly adds one more level of cost too.

The thought here, I believe, is that these intermediary companies have enough net worth so that if the investor had to buy a loan back from Fannie Mae, he could turn around and make the originator buy it back from him.  At least that’s what they tell each other.

Each of these investors has its own fear factor working also and it expresses itself through “underwriting overlays.”  We may get an approval from Fannie Mae’s automated underwriting system that calls for one year’s 1040s.  OK. What they investor asks for, however, is two years’ 1040s. They are afraid that some time in the future, Fannie and Freddie may say, “I know we only asked you for one year’s 1040s, but you should have known to get two years.’ So buy this loan back.”

[Resource: A Step-by-Step Guide to Buying A Home in Any Market]

This also gives them an opportunity to lower income. For example, let’s say a borrower made $10,000 per month in 2009. On that income, he qualifies.  But in 2008 he only made $8,000.  A two year average is $9,000 per month and maybe now he does not qualify.  That means they will not do the loan because it doesn’t meet the investor’s guidelines. Believe me, no one cares that that loan and a thousand other perfectly good loans were denied!

You can see, however, that even using the word “relationship” is hard in these circumstances.  It’s a transaction business and transaction businesses can degenerate to the maxim, “What have you done for me lately?”

The other factor is that a job with a company like Chase or Wells Fargo had a little cachet to it. You might be just one more employee in a company with 100,000 or 200,000 employees, but at least from all outward appearances, you had a good employee benefit package and the possibility of a decent career.

You had to deal with the potential of someone a continent away “doing away with your division” as happened to many, many people I know who were employed by those big companies. In fact, I can safely say that except for people I have met just recently, all of the old timers I know in this business are working for a different company than they were when we first met. In some cases, it’s been four or five companies. You have to admire their ability to keep landing on their feet.

[Product Spotlight: Get a Free Credit Score Trial with Equifax 3-in1 Monitoring with Credit Score]

But there is a dark shadow here too.  We are a cyclical business and in good times, we need perhaps twice as many employees as in bad times.   So one of the things that happens as we enter bad times is that some good employees get laid off with the poorer ones. In fact, I have personally seen instances where the higher paid people were laid off first. You save more money when you lay off someone making $70,000 and turn the job over to someone making $40,000.

In good times, they hire people but the best potential employees, ones who had good experience but were cut the last time say, “Not me.  You tell me it’s a permanent job but I know as soon as the cycle goes on the down side, I’ll be laid off again. I won’t work in this industry again, ever.”  And these were our best people!

If you conclude that this is a pretty dumb way to run an industry, you’d be right. So as a borrower, be well prepared and be patient.

Image by Jeremy Brooks, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team