Home > Identity Theft > Don’t Track Me: The War Over Online Ads Starts Now

Comments 1 Comment

CircuitRight now, somebody is watching you. Actually, many people are. How many? It’s almost impossible to tell. What do they want to know about you? Only they know. After they follow you around for a while, what will they do with all the information they gather about you? They don’t have to tell you. They might not even know themselves.

Welcome to the modern Internet. Specifically, welcome to the industry of online tracking and advertising. It’s obscure, huge and growing.  Every web site you visit has little tools, hidden in plain sight, tracking what you do online. There may be just one company tracking you, dozens, or even a hundred.

The data they gather is used to build a detailed profile of you, including your hobbies, which sites you visit, where you live, your gender and age. That profile helps advertisers make informed guesses about what you might want to buy, and which ad has the best chance of convincing you to buy it.

To the extent that Americans even know about the online tracking and advertising industry, they don’t like what they’ve heard. In a poll conducted in December by Gallup, 70% of Americans said advertisers should not be allowed to match ads to our interests based on the websites we visit (even though the industry already does exactly that, millions of times a day). Most people, 65%, are against tracking even if it means they get free access to websites.

“The problem is the whole online publishing economy is built on online advertising,” says Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, a nonprofit group that pushes for consumer and privacy rights online. “It’s dehumanizing. The whole process of tracking people in with information about their race, their kids, their medical histories, knowing where they are in real time, it’s capitalism’s version of George Orwell. It’s alarming. It’s disturbing.”

[Article: Oversharing is the New Nicotine]

Another problem is that, right now, the only way to avoid being tracked online is to never go online.  There’s a wide array of tools available to reduce the number of companies tracking you across the web. But none of them work in every situation.

So the Federal Trade Commission has proposed the ultimate opt-out tool: Do Not Track. The commission proposed the idea in a report published in December, and consumers have until Feb. 18 to comment on whether it’s a good idea. The FTC hopes Do Not Track will do for online marketing what Do Not Call did for telemarketing: Submit a heretofore unregulated industry to consumers’ desire for privacy.

“Although the practicalities of a proposed choice mechanism here would differ from Do Not Call,” according to the FTC report, “it would be similar in that it would allow consumers to express a single persistent preference regarding advertising targeted to them.”

Consumer advocates say it’s about time.

“The industry has refused really to act responsibly and admit there’s a privacy problem,” Chester says. “The industry is living in the previous century. The FTC is living in the 21st century.”

People who work in the online tracking and advertising industry counter that they don’t threaten privacy at all, and that Do Not Track could limit free content on the web without securing any additional privacy for consumers.

“I think the FTC is solving the wrong problem,” says Jonathan Shapiro, CEO of MediaWhiz, an online advertising company. “The real problem is identity theft, which has actually harmed people. ID theft doesn’t occur by large marketing organizations tracking people online.”

How Tracking Works »

Image: quapan, via Flickr.com

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team