Home > 2011 > Credit Cards > California Courts Grant Cardholders More Privacy

California Courts Grant Cardholders More Privacy

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

California Supreme Court rules that retailers can no longer ask for certain personal information when conducting transactions.California’s Supreme Court ruled in favor of greater cardholder privacy this week in a decision that will likely affect many state consumers when they make credit card purchases.

In a unanimous ruling, the seven judges of the state’s high court found that retailers do not have the right to ask consumers to supply their ZIP code when completing credit card transactions.

The decision, which stems from a class-action lawsuit against home retailer Williams-Sonoma, overturns an earlier legal precedent from 1971. This prior ruling stated that consumers could not be asked for personal information that may be used to track them, CNN reports.

[Resource: 12 Tips for Protecting Your Identity]

In the case, Jessica Pineda was asked for her ZIP code by Williams-Sonoma. The company then sold information compiled from its customers to other sources who used it to get her home address. Retailers may still ask for this information under the new decision; however, they will be barred from recording it or storing it in a database.

However, while many consumers will likely approve of the decision due to its stance on privacy, some experts are displeased with the outcome, the news source says.

“We think it’s a terrible decision because it dramatically expands what personal information is, by including a ZIP code as part of an address,” Bill Dombrowski, president of the California Retailers Association, told CNN. “We are surprised by it.”

However, the ruling would allow for ZIP codes to be collected by merchants in certain scenarios, such as at gas station pumps where it is used for security reasons. The law also specified that this information would remain required for bank deposits and cash advances, The Los Angeles Times reports.

While the new ruling would only affect credit card users in California, it echoes similar legislation that has been enacted in other states.

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.