Home > 2011 > Personal Finance

Big Banks Threaten Debit Card Cap

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

CutCard_RogueSunMediaSome of the nation’s largest banks are considering a cap on all debit card transactions. Big banks including JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup might limit each debit card purchase to $50 or $100 if Congress approves new rules aimed at limiting swipe fees, industry sources said Friday.

“I’m hearing the same things that everybody else is hearing” including a possible transaction cap, says Peter Garuccio, a spokesman for the American Bankers Association. “The bottom line is this forces a minimum 70% reduction in revenue. Some of our members don’t believe they’ll be able to manage that.”

Such a cap could change how millions of Americans shop. Since the average family spends $122 a week on food, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, a trip to the grocery store could put many consumers over the limit and they’d have to find another way to pay.

[Related Article: House Debit Card Interchange Hearing Favors Delay]

“What’s the alternative? Start writing checks again? Going to the ATM to get cash?” says Gerri Detweiler, Credit.com’s credit and debt expert. “It’s not practical to say people are going to start using their credit cards because a lot of people don’t have credit cards, or they are close to their limits.”

Bank insiders confirmed that these institutions are considering such a cap, but they declined to speak on the record. The Durbin Amendment, which Congress passed last year, required the Federal Reserve to create new rules limiting debit swipe fees, known in the industry as “interchange” fees, which retailers complain have risen steeply in recent years.

Some speculate that the threat to cap debit card use could be a strategic one.

“I wonder if this is just another effort on the part of banks and issuers to scare legislators off the Durbin amendment,” said Detweiler.  “I do absolutely believe there will be consumer consequences. But the idea that they would cap the amount consumers could spend on their debit cards seems like a least likely scenario to me. More likely in my opinion would be annual or transaction fees for debit cards, or fewer free checking accounts.”

The Fed’s proposal would cap most swipe fees at 12 cents per transaction. That’s an 80% reduction from the current average fee of 63 cents, according to the Fed. Banks collect about $15 billion annually from the current fees.

[Featured products: Monitor your credit reports and scores]

Bank representatives accuse the Fed of price-fixing, with big potential downsides for consumers.

“The government-mandated price control elements in the Federal Reserve’s proposed rule will severely affect consumers everywhere, causing new consumer fees, including checking account fees, and pushing low-income customers out of the banking system,” David Kemper, CEO of Commerce Bank, told the House Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit on Friday.

Retailers support the Fed’s proposal, saying it would save consumers and retailers $1 billion every month. The National Retail Federation accuses banks of trying to stall necessary reform.

“Congress recognized last year that the credit card companies and big banks have been extracting monopoly-like fees from merchants and their customers for far too long,” Mallory Dunca, general counsel for the federation, said in a press release.

The Fed is scheduled to release the final rules in April.

Image: RogueSun Media, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team