Home > Credit Cards > The Lowdown on Southwest Airlines New Rewards Program

Comments 28 Comments

Southwest Airlines MilesWanna get away? If you’re planning to use your Southwest Airlines Rapid Rewards Credit Card to pay for a getaway after March 1, you’d better check the details of the All-New Rapid Rewards program. Southwest Airlines is overhauling its Rapid Rewards program and the changes are effective on March 1, 2011. Ryan Green, Senior Director of  Customer Loyalty and Partnerships, writes in his blog that cardholders should be on the lookout for information that will be sent directly to them.

But you can get the details right now by visiting NewRapidRewards.com. The landing page starts with a video introduction and then you get a nifty graphic listing what’s changed. The current program uses a combination of Reward Dollars and bonus credits. Southwest is converting to a point system, but you won’t lose your existing credits. Check out the second part of the graphic, “What About My Credits & Awards,” and you’ll find a credit-to-point conversion table.

Southwest is based in Texas and known for its low-cost domestic airfares. The new point system will be based on the cost of flights as opposed to the number of flights taken. This move seems designed to attract the business traveler, who typically can spend more for travel.

No matter how they try to spin this, it looks like a move to encourage consumers to spend more on airfare. But honestly, there are some things to like about the new Rapid Rewards program. Southwest has done away with blackouts. And your points won’t expire, which is a huge improvement over the previous program. Plus, you’ll be able to redeem points for international flights.

If you’re a current cardholder, take the time to read over the details so you can decide if this is still the right frequent flyer program for you.  Those who travel for leisure and count on a low-cost flight to rack up points need to think about it carefully. Although some of you, especially those who travel for business, might find the new program goes further to meet your needs.

Image: Mike Fisher, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • cfsf

    This is a major downgrade to Rapid Rewards for frequent short-haul travelers, who probably represent most of Southwest’s frequent fliers.

    Until now, you could spend less than $1000 for 8 cheap (“Wanna Get Away”) short-distance round-trips within 2 years (I’ve flown several such flights recently for round-trip fares ranging from $80 to $140), and then you would get a free round trip *anywhere*. Many destinations cost $400-500 per round-trip even with the cheapest web-only fares. So you could easily spend around $1000 (potentially as little as $650) and then get a $400 trip free.

    Now (assuming you don’t have lots of money to waste on expensive “Anytime” or Business fares), if you spend $1000, you’ll get a free trip worth exactly $100.

    Of course, Southwest trumpets all the improvements and most reporters parrot them. I’ve read many news items about this, and only one, in a little Baltimore paper (http://bit.ly/fDw14q), described what I’ve pointed out here, which is probably the most typical actual effect of the changes. Boo Southwest. Boo reporters!

  • Beverly Blair Harzog

    Thanks for your comment. Well, I think I understand your frustration. The focus of the program is shifting away from what’s been their target market all these years. The new rewards program is courting the business traveler, who will spend more dollars. As I pointed out at the end, if you travel for leisure and liked racking up points with low airfare, you need to reconsider if this is the right card for you. I can see you’ve already done that!

  • http://gtfowler@gmail.com Gail

    Are they saying dollars spent using my Southwest Visa will no longer get me credits for domestic flights on Southwest Airlines?

  • cfsf

    FWIW, I thought your article was fairer than most, and I appreciate your sympathetic reply to my comment. Still, your attitude seemed to be, well, this is good in some ways and bad in others, which strictly speaking is true. But when the typical value of reward credits (i.e. the amount you could save on a reward after spending a given amount of money on flights) is cut to roughly one QUARTER of what it was before, the other little enhancements (no blackout dates, no expiration), while they’re admittedly an improvement on those aspects of the old program, hardly balance the HUGE devaluation of their rewards.

    I don’t fault Southwest for making this change – truly, their rewards were amazingly good in the old program, and it was hard to understand how they could afford them. I only fault them, and most reporters, for spinning this huge devaluation of their rewards as some kind of wonderful new program that might actually be better for most people.

    If you’re someone who typically flew at least 4 long-haul, round-trip flights per year and didn’t ever take shorter flights, or if you flew less than 4 trips/year, this program will probably be better for you because of the various little improvements. But if, like most flyers, you also (or primarily) take short flights, this program will give you much less value than the old one. Fine, if they can’t afford to hand out lavish rewards any more, just say so, but don’t try to sell it as “new and improved”!

  • Beverly Blair Harzog

    cfsf–I appreciate your perspective on this. Thanks again for your comments.

  • Beverly Blair Harzog

    Gail–They’re converting to a point system, but you won’t lose the credits you already have. The details, along with a credit-to-point conversion table, is on http://www.NewRapidRewards.com.

    The new program is based on how much you spend on flights as opposed to how frequently you fly. It really reaches out more to the business traveler since they typically spend more on airfare.

  • DC

    I switched from flying United on domestic flights to SW a few years ago even though I am business traveler with UA premier exec status for life (Million Mile Club). Looks like SW just did United a BIG FAVOR. I’ll give my money to UA and take the first class upgrades as a bonus. Nice going Gary……

  • RH

    If a person flies the same itinerary all the time, the new program gives one free trip per ten paid trips, a 9% discount for loyal customers. The old program gave 1 per 8 paid trips at worst, and even without working to game the system, normal variation in flight costs would allow a frequent flyer to get a 15% to 20% discount.

    The credit card portion of the program is also reduced in value. The old program provided a domestic round-trip per 19,200 dollars spent, better than “major” airline programs which were nominally one per 20,000 or 25,000 dollars. The new program is more similar to a 1% rebate, payable in the form of free tickets. And while other airline programs either allow annual fees to be waived or return substantial value (such as a free or $99 companion ticket), the new Southwest program returns 2400 points, worth $24 toward the next frequent flyer ticket.

    I estimate that the changes in the aggregate will save Southwest between 30 and 40% of its annual loyalty program costs. That savings comes primarily at the expense of the typical Southwest frequent flyers.

  • Pingback: Watch Out for the New Fees | Credit card Search()

  • dwil

    Hmmm….Gary Kelly, Southwest chief honcho is a clever bean counter (accountant) who is playing fast and loss with the sales lingo. For instance, “doing away with Blackout dates.” This hasn’t been the problem, the probelm was his decision to allocate limited Reward Seat while having open “Freedom Seats” which required double rewards. Now he is replacing the the Freedom Reward with higher prices. Blackouts were less the problem than patrons who saw thru Gary’s Freedom Awards which should have been named ” Lost Freedom” Awards.

  • Beverly Blair Harzog

    dwil–Good point regarding the blackout dates.

    RH–Thanks for taking the time to share those numbers. I fly out of Atlanta so I’m not a Southwest customer or cardholder. I love getting the perspective of the consumers who are actually being affected by these changes. The new program is definitely geared toward the business frequent flyer.

  • Chuck

    The big lose with the new program is the loss of the companion pass. That stinks.

  • dfwperson

    Southwest has actually devalued their flights considerably, actually point for point, they have now moved American Airlines to the front of the line for the most generous awards program. You can fly anytime any flight on American for 50K, if there is no 25K award available. On Southwest, they have now made it to where some of their so-called any flight would cost up to 100K miles, seems double price to me. Consider that on their “wanna get away fare to OKC from Dallas at $39 X 6 points =234 points for this flight. Now if you want to fly to say LAS from Dallas at the last minute, now could cost upwards of 48K milers each way for a total of 96K for ONE roundtrip ticket. Compare to AA for 50K any ticket anytime, but a lot available, even last minute at 25K. Plus if all you fly is the cheap routes it would now take 41 one way trips for ONE free ticket. WOW——-By the way they are KEEPing the Companion pass, the only good thing they are keeping along with lowering the restriction for A list, which will allow More people in that list, crowding the current ones more. Keep in mind Southwest does not offer the lower fares one to two weeks out, so any last minute trips will require business select or anytime at the higher rate of 120 or 100 per dollar.

  • L. Williams

    If they are trying to appeal to more business customers, then they better up their game. Wider seats, more ammeniities, in-flight wi-fi, TVs in the seats, etc…I fly Southwest because it is cheap, so I do not complain about the tiny seats and the ridiculous seating game. Now, I will be forced to choose between other carriers. JetBlue is by far better just for the inflight comfort on the cheap. If I am looking for the best airline program, I will have to check out American based on what was stated in this thread.

  • PWS

    Just yesterday I had a last minute change to my plans and flying out earlier in the day worked better for a trip just a few days away. I was flying on a free SW ticket and sure enough they had seats available on the earlier fight so I just switched my reservation. The ability to do this is one of the things I loved about SW. Now however, if I were to do that there would be a substantial increase in the cost using the new points due to it being within a week. My options now would be to look for a cheap fare on another airlines and cancel my SW flight. So sad.

  • Beverly Blair Harzog

    I really appreciate the thoughts that you’ve all shared here. I’ve yet to hear from someone who thinks these changes are in any way a good thing for consumers.

    L. Wlliams–That’s a good point about tiny seats and business flyers. Perhaps they’re hoping to bring in small business owners with limited cash flow rather than the more affluent crowd.

    At any rate, I’ll be following this story and doing another blog about this as we get closer to March 1. So stay tuned and keep your thoughts coming!

  • the traveling emergency manager

    After flying with SW for the past 7 years and enjoying the “freedom” of traveling the western US for business and back east for conferences, My company (who does an excess of $500K+ in SW business) did a cost benefit of continuing with SW and their new point system. It was found that we would be losing $$ with this program. It’s a shame, we really like flying SW.

    We have opened a business account with United as well. I have heard that FEMA will be doing the same.

  • Mike from Las Vegas

    As a 30 year A-List, Companion Pass traveler with SWA, I’m more than disappointed that SW chose to follow the Majors into FF “devaluation land”. The current program was easy to understand, easy to administer and easy to redeem.

  • Beverly Blair Harzog

    I hear you, Mike. I’ve written a new blog about this subject since the changes take effect tomorrow. So be on the lookout for it this afternoon.

    I agree that the new Rapid Rewards aren’t as easy to understand. Southwest appears to be courting the business flyer. A lucrative market, to be sure. But as a few astute posters here have pointed out, the new program doesn’t do enough to position them well with the business flyers.

  • Craig

    I found that I lost most of my accumulated flight segments required for the SWA A-List going from just 3 flights required to achieve their A-List to only 24% of required flights? This new program is not working for me.

  • Darrell

    I travel on SW weekly and found the prior program matched my short-haul travel. Loved the ability to not have to long on to a website to figure out how many flights until a free flight. Simple in a complex world. Now its mystery meat. You rely on price. If that is the case then post the table. There is another item. The free tickets are calculated based upon where you want to go. They even have a graphical slider to show you based on points where you can travel.
    Ok Gary even AA doesn’t discriminate on travel within the US. Yes they have blackouts sure, but looking at a map and charging more points because the mileage is 500 miles more from the destination. As a business flyer this isn’t working for me either. My loyalty to SWA is gone. SWA has gone mainstream.

  • joel

    I am so disappointed, I previously had 11 flights, so i had earned a free flight, but for some reason the site did not have that free flight info before you changed the rules. So I figured it was just a glitch since you were working on a new program and I decided to wait until you updated your site. Now it says I need 16 flights for one free one, This is not fair at all!!

  • cfadduol

    Totally ridiculous! Two hours to book 3 flights! I hope jet blue keeps expanding

  • Byron

    Southwest has just become AA and Continental. Next…they will have 1st Class seats. Shame shame shame. the only thing that really sucks about it however is…they are trying to tell me IT’S THE SAME…WE JUST USE POINTS INSTEAD OF FLIGHT CREDITS. The problem is….A round trip flight to Dallas to Houston got me 2 credits. 1/8 of what I need to fly to LA. Now. Dallas to Houston wouldn’t come close to getting me to LA in 8 flights. So stop patronizing me and telling me it’s the same…when the actuality is…if you have money to pay more for flights, you will get more in return. The perfect analogy of “Rich get richer, poor get poorer….”

  • okima hitt

    Totally disappointing! I’ve been flying SW for years between NY and IL to see my kids who are both in college in Chicago and for business. I was due for a free flight when the rules changed and lost all of my credit. I’ve never flown Jet Blue, but will be looking to them first for my next trip.

    • Beverly Blair Harzog

      Well, that is a shame. You might call and ask if they can work out something for you. Let them know how loyal you’ve been and how you’ve relied on SW to see your kids. If that doesn’t get you anywhere, there are plenty of airline cards as well as travel cards that might meet your needs. At the moment, there are some really good sign-up bonuses out there, some including a free ticket.

  • Jan

    I haven’t flown SWA since they changed to the points system. What I really hate is that Business Travellers can get big points when travelling on their Company’s nickel and have a bunch of points to spend on the “cheap seats.” If SWA wanted to make it fair, the Bus Points should have to be spent on Business seats. The Bus traveller is flush with points to compete for the cheap seats. Not fair SWA, not fair.

  • duncan a mcpherson

    What am I missing? Chase Saphire just offered me 50,000 points to sign up with them.
    Chase SWA, my existing card, offers next to nothing to stay with them. It appears I am better off to cancel my SWA chase. I have superb credit. Eventually SWA or someone else, will offer a meaningful incentive to get my business. Why don’t reporters report on this industry practice? Who’s interests do reporters represent?

    • Beverly Harzog

      Hi Duncan–The problem is that these great offers are for new cardholders, right? I know that’s frustrating and I agree the new SWA rewards program leaves a lot to be desired for existing cardholders. It’s really a better fit for the business traveler.

      You ask who interests reporters represent. That depends on the pub/website, frankly. But my goal is to be a consumer advocate. If there’s something you’d like to know, ask away!

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team