Home > Personal Finance > IRS: Majority of Taxpayers are “Special Interest”

Comments 0 Comments

Tax Shelter imageEven the IRS says the tax code is too complicated. In a recent report, the National Taxpayer Advocate, who serves as the watchdog of the IRS, says the U.S. tax code is too long, too complex and takes too much time to figure out, which squanders taxpayers’ time and costs the government billions of dollars a year.

Both political parties like to blame the budget’s complexity on “special interest,” a code word that to Republicans means unions and minorities, and to Democrats mean big corporations.

The truth is much simpler, writes U.S. taxpayer advocate Nina E. Olson in the IRS’ 2010 annual report to Congress – “the vast majority of U.S. taxpayers” are “special interest.”

“Tax complexity doesn’t occur just because of “big money” special interests,” Olson wrote in her report. “It occurs because of the tax provisions that benefit each one of us. We are the special interests. And until we acknowledge that, tax reform discussions will deteriorate into shouting matches and finger pointing about cutting ‘their’ special tax breaks and not ‘ours.’”

Tax loopholes and write-offs are officially called “expenditures,” which all told cost the government $1.1 trillion a year, and save the average taxpayer $8,000 annually.

One of the biggest expenditures is the mortgage interest tax credit, which is claimed by the 67% of Americans who own homes, according to the Census Bureau. This single loophole costs the Treasury $131 billion in 2012, almost three times the entire $48-billion budget of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The exemption no longer serves its intended purpose when it was created in 1913: encouraging poor people and the lower middle class to buy homes, according to a study by the Brookings Institution. “Because most who benefit would own homes without the deduction, it mostly provides an incentive to live in more expensive homes, not to own instead of rent,” the study found.

Olson’s recommendation: Get rid of it.

“To start out, the assumption should be that all tax expenditures would be eliminated,” she writes.

Olson noticed other conflicts between American’s real-life credit lives and the tax code. Sometimes the IRS is too quick to believe a taxpayer’s private debt is paid off before it actually is, often because of reporting mistakes. This makes the IRS too aggressive in trying to obtain back taxes.

Olson says the IRS also does a poor job of calculating taxpayers’ ability to pay tax debts because it doesn’t take into account things like credit card bills, state or local taxes or overly high mortgage payments. That causes the IRS to demand unreasonably high tax debt payments, “creating hardships, and leaving the taxpayers less able to pay taxes due in future periods,” according to the report.

Image: JD Hancock, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team