Home > Mortgages > Florida AG Details Forgery & Deceit in Mortgage Process

Comments 1 Comment

Boarded Up HomeIf the mortgage mess makes little sense to you, the Florida attorney general’s office created a handy slideshow titled “Unfair, Deceptive and Unconscionable Acts in Foreclosure Cases.” It’s both a great primer on the mortgage servicing industry, and a damning description of what Attorney General Pam Bondi calls a broken system.

The presentation starts out with a quick but in-depth look at how a loan is transferred from the original lender to other banks and loan servicers that actually handle the busywork of receiving loan payments, and making sure that investors and local taxes are paid.

The key to that process is called the “assignment,” which is used to transfer ownership of the loan from one party to the next. The typical loan receives four letters of assignment, and sometimes more, as it passes from the original lender all the way to the investors who ultimately come to own it.

That’s where things began to fall apart, according to Bondi. During the housing boom, banks were dealing with so many assignments of so many mortgages that they simply could not keep up.

Who Is Linda Green?So they cheated, Bondi says. Her presentation tracks the impossibly varied career of Linda Green, whose signature was forged onto hundreds of thousands of mortgage assignments. The presentation shows 13 such signatures, none of which resemble the others in any way. It also documents 14 jobs that Linda Green’s signature forgers claimed she had, as vice president of everything from Bank of America to Seattle Mortgage Company.

In their rush to plow through as many assignments as possible, made up other things, too. One document in the presentation says the loan assignment will become effective on 9/9/9999.

Another transfers the mortgage to “BOGUS ASSIGNEE.”

House image: Kevin Dooley, via Flickr.com

Signature image from slide show at www.StopForeclosureFraud.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Pingback: More Hurdles for Mortgage Servicing Deal | Twin Rivers Communications Mortgage Readers & Consultants()

  • http://www.scribd.com/doc/46233683/Letter-from-Bank-of-America-Admits-they-DO-NOT-OWN-THE-NOTE-while-attaching-a-FORGED-NOTE-to-their-letter Samuel Salmon

    Bank of America Admits FORGERY and authorities turn a blind eye!
    Our unstable economic environment is largely due to the corruption within our own stock market, and its tie to the US Treasury via the Government Sponsored Enterprises, or GSE’s like Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, etc. The US government has no business using American taxpayer dollars as investments, but worse is the fact that the large banks which now don’t function as a traditional bank are “servicers” of the mortgages which have been bought up lock stock and barrel by the GSEs with the tax payers money. This is the reason behind civil unrest due to illegal foreclosures. Federal and State law prohibit the servicers from foreclosing on a mortgage if they are not the beneficiary of the loan, meaning they don’t own the note, but the laws do not seem to be an issue here as these illegal foreclosures are continuing and these properties are being confiscated by the servicers in spite of the fact they have already been fully reimbursed for the note by the GSE via tax dollars and the servicer no longer owns the note. Meanwhile countless families are being thrust into the street while the servicer confiscates their home paid for by the US taxpayers. It gets worse yet, the GSE takes and buys the notes, (with our taxes) and converts them into stocks through a process called securitization, which means the loan is no longer a loan but a stock under the rules of the SEC and the GSE proceeds to sell the stock on the stock marked as Residential Mortgage Backed Securities, or RMBS. This system will destroy our economy completely if it continues to go unchecked and unaccounted for.
    I have challenged Bank of America (BAC) who has claimed to be the beneficiary of my note at the county recorder’s office, but has admitted that they don’t own my note. Even with this letter from the office of CEO and President of BAC the judge has ruled in BAC’s favor in my Pro Se case. Even when BAC admits they are not the owner of the note the authorities are still overlooking their criminal acts. If I were to claim myself as beneficiary of your loan while admitting I don’t own it and produce a copy of your note as if I owned it, I would be thrown into jail for up to 10 years. This is exactly what Bank of America is doing.

    Should a bank be allowed to foreclose if they don’t own your NOTE?
    NO because:
    1. Beneficiary means owner of the note/mortgage, most 90%+ banks do not own the note yet claim to be the beneficiary.
    2. Federal and State law requires the forecloser to be the note owne.
    3. When a note is converted into a stock it is no longer a loan and is under the authority of the SEC not the FDIC.
    4. Most mortgage notes are not loans because they have been converted into stocks and sold on the stock market as RMBS.
    5. Your servicer most likely 95%+ does not own your note.
    Thanks for listening,

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team