Home > 2011 > Personal Finance > Could Wall Street’s Bailout Become Taxpayer’s Boon?

Could Wall Street’s Bailout Become Taxpayer’s Boon?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

WallStreetRemember the Wall Street Bailout? You know, that horrible travesty that cost taxpayers billions and rewarded Wall Street’s worst risk takers for plunging the American economy into the dump?

Well don’t look now, but the bailout may become one of the best investments taxpayers ever made.

In 2009 the Treasury Department paid $22.1 billion for troubled assets, mostly securities backed up by mortgages. Many of those mortgages were in danger of going into foreclosure, which made the securities risky and won them the name “troubled.” Nobel Prize-wining economist Joseph Stiglitz said the program was a “robbery of the American people.”

Well in this case, the robbers have done a pretty amazing job of paying the money back. The value of Treasury-backed securities has grown 27% in the last year and a half, according to a new study published by the Treasury Department.

But the investment is not yet a resounding success, some experts warned. The government has yet to be paid for about $9 billion of its debt, the report said, and increased foreclosure rates could endanger repayment.

Image: Douglas LeMoine, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.