Home > Mortgages > B of A’s Big Bill for Bad Loans Finally Comes Due

Comments 0 Comments

B of A Clock image


Bank of America will pay the government $2.6 billion to resolve hundreds of thousands of illegal or fraudulent mortgage loans. And the nation’s largest bank could still be on the hook for billions of dollars more if additional homeowners fail to repay loans that were made illegally.

Still, the agreement is much smaller than many analysts had predicted.

“So what is evident that no one knows what they are talking about” when it comes to estimating the cost of the ongoing mortgage crisis, says Dick Bove, bank analyst with Rochdale Securities LLC. “Including myself.”

The settlement deals with loans made by Countrywide Financial, which Bank of America bought in 2009. The loans were then sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two private mortgage giants that were taken over by the government in 2008 after both companies went bankrupt due to the subprime mortgage crisis.

Analysts including Bove believed that Bank of America could owe Fannie and Freddie as much as $20 billion on the bad loans. Instead, the bank paid Freddie Mac $1.28 billion in cash on Dec. 31, according to a bank press release. It also will pay Fannie Mae $1.52 billion.

The announcement appears to be good news for Bank of America.  Fannie and Freddie originally asked the bank to buy back $6.8 billion worth of bad loans.  That’s slightly more than half of the $12.9 billion the bank said it could potentially owe investors on mortgages gone sour, according to a presentation to bank investors given Oct. 19.

After the deal was announced, Bank of America’s stock rose 85 cents, or 6.5%. Even though $2.6 billion sounds like a lot of money to most people, it represents just a tiny fraction of the bank’s $2.3 trillion in assets.

“Our goals remain the same: put these issues behind us; focus on serving customers and clients; and continue to help distressed homeowners facing difficult times,” Brian Moynihan, Bank of America’s CEO, said in a press release.

The agreement may be less good news for taxpayers, who own Fannie and Freddie since the government took control of both private companies in 2008 during the subprime mortgage crisis.

“It’s much less than I had assumed,” Bove says.

Fannie Mae didn’t comment on the agreement, which leaves the company the option to bring new claims in the future if more fraudulent loans go bad. Freddie Mac’s CEO, Charles E. Haldeman, defended the agreement, which effectively closes any chance Freddie has of bringing future claims.

“I’m pleased to reach this agreement with Bank of America and believe it is in all parties’ best interests,” he said in a press release.

Image: Taber Andrew Bain, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team