Home > Students > 5 Ways to Out-Smart the College Experience

Comments 2 Comments

AcademicallyAdriftLast week a new study took the academic world by storm.  NYU sociologist Richard Arum and his associate Josipa Roksa published Academically Adrift, an analysis of 2,300 college students and their learning improvement over time.  Students in the study took the Collegiate Learning Exam (CLE), a standardized test, in their first semester and then again at the end of their second year. Forty-five percent showed no major improvement in skills ranging from critical thinking to writing to complex reasoning.

Naturally, the controversy over this study, hailed as “the most important higher education study in years,” has refueled the debate over the validity of a college education.  Why should students and families sink tens of thousands of dollars into an educational experience and support an institution that guarantees individuals little to no academic progress?

The research makes a mockery of higher education and the students who are apparently too busy socializing to study. That said, I never thought of college as an institute for getting smarter.  It may be marketed as much, but, let’s be straight: there are a number of myths about college. For example, did you know that only a third of college students graduate in four years? Most take five or six, if they graduate at all.

My take on college is a pragmatic one. You should go, but don’t waste time or money. I recall my father saying very matter-of-factly, as I was deciding on schools, “Why pay $50,000 a year to go to NYU when you’re going to take the same 100 level courses your first year or two in college at Penn State, where it’s a fraction of the price? If you decide you hate Penn State, transfer. At least then you’ve saved yourself thousands of dollars.” Point taken. And then there was my boss during a summer internship in college who turned to me and said, “You don’t go to college to get smarter, Farnoosh.  You go there to grow up, network and prepare for your career.”  If you learn some Latin and memorize the formula for the Capital Asset Pricing Model along the way – and it sticks – even better.

This is not to say that the college system isn’t flawed or that we should excuse its shortcomings.  As one critic writes, the college degree is having “an identity crisis,” and I couldn’t agree more. But we can’t just boycott college until administrators find a better way to teach. Or hope that students who engage in keg stands and beer pong on weeknights will volunteer to spend more time at the library.  Don’t forget that, at the very least, a college degree still promises a greater earnings potential. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median annual income for someone with a bachelor’s degree is $53,300. For those with only a high school diploma the amount is $32,552, a difference of $20,748. At least financially, the diploma can go a long way.

5 Tips to Get the Most Out of College»

Pages: 1 2

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.debtfreecollegedegree.com April bishop

    Hello,
    Thank you for your nice Information. I like it very much. I will try it at my home

  • Michael Lupacchino

    I especially like # 5. I graduated in 3.5 years thanks to AP Credits from High School. I saved a whole semester’s worth of tuition and associated costs, but still remained involved with my friends and walked with the rest of my class at Commencement in May. If you can get additional credits from other routes (AP, Community College, CLEP exam) DO IT!!

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team