Credit Cards

CARD Act Loophole Number 73 – Student Loans are Income, Apparently

Comments 5 Comments

Student-loans-are-income The CARD Act requires that lenders now take steps to ensure that their applicants have some sort of ability to pay their debt obligations. The fact that it took a Federal law to accomplish this is a head-scratcher for sure. The question is, how are lenders doing this and how are they navigating around and through the requirement?

First off, your credit reports don’t contain your salary, so that’s a dead end. Second, your credit risk scores are not designed to predict capacity to pay, but are rather designed to predict the likelihood of you paying so that’s a dead end too. And lastly, trusting what you put on your credit application as “income” has proven to be unreliable, so that’s not really an option either.

This is certainly a capacity conundrum. And, since the world of credit is not without humor, I gladly bring you CARD Act loophole number 73: Student loans and the “no cards for those under 21” rule. A student loan is a real loan with strange terms. It’s issued by a bank and is sometimes federally guaranteed. The monies are generally disbursed quarterly or each semester to coincide with the school’s preferred method of slicing up the school year. The loans are meant to go toward funding tuition and college related costs.

What allows student loans to become a loophole to the CARD Act capacity to pay provision is the fact that most student loans are paid to the student rather than to the school directly. Then the student uses it to pay for tuition and books and other school expenses, or at least that’s the plan. I know people who used their student loans for expenses that would never be confused with scholastic expenses.

And if what we’re hearing is true, credit card issuers are considering student loans to be income rather than a liability. It seems to make sense to do so considering there is no immediate obligation to pay back a student loan, and by the time the loan enters the payback period the student will likely be employed. But still, if 100% of the loan is meant to be paid to the school, how can it be income?

John Ulzheimer – Credit scoring and credit reporting expert and author, John is the President of Consumer Education for Formerly with Equifax and Fair Isaac, John shares his unique insight of the inner workings of credit scoring models and the credit reporting industry on

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Kelly

    I think a better idea is using your credit card to pay down your student loan.

  • Anonymous

    It is the same idea that if you have come to a settlement agreement with the credit card company to pay less than what you credit card balance is, the difference eventually becomes income to you. If you are already in financial trouble and cannot afford to pay for the debt, now you still have to pay Uncle Sam for this “phantom” income. That is just part of the law I guess.

  • Chris

    (Kelly) Using a credit card to pay down your student loans? This seems like it would only be a good idea if you eventually want to default on that money.

  • Lonnie

    100% of student loans aren’t meant to be paid to the school.

    • Daniel Widrew

      this exactly. student loans (or at least my loans, i can’t speak for everyone) also can be used for housing, living expenses, etc. while you are in school.

Find out where you stand.
Get your FREE personalized credit report card.

Sign Up Now

Stay connected to our experts

Please submit your email address to get credit & money tips & advice
from our team of 30+ experts, delivered weekly to your inbox.