Students

New Private Student Loan Bill Introduced

Comments 4 Comments

A long-awaited bill introduced in Congress on Wednesday could spell the beginning of the end for private lenders in the federal student loan system. Get ready for another partisan battle.

The legislation sponsored by Rep. George Miller, a Democrat from Northern California who heads the House Education and Labor Committee, closely resembles the plan offered by President Obama. Both plans would eliminate the subsidized interest payments and default guarantees made by the government to banks and other lenders that generate loans under the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) program. All new loans would instead be issued under the existing federal Direct Loan program and paid by the U.S. Treasury starting in 2010.

Despite the partisan bickering that’s sure to come, the upshot of the bill is that having the government make all student loans directly would save students money. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the switch would save $87 billion over 10 years. Here’s how most of the savings would be spent:

  • $40 billion would be put toward bolstering Pell Grants (which don’t have to be repaid) given to low-income college students. The annual maximum amount would grow from $5,550 in 2010 to $6,900 by 2019.
  • $12 billion would go toward enhancing the nation’s community-college system, which Obama discussed in a speech in Michigan on Tuesday.
  • Another $10 billion would be set aside for early childhood education programs.
  • $1.2 billion would be devoted to historically black colleges and “minority-serving institutions.”

Banks and many Republicans in Congress oppose the switch, arguing that it would give the government a monopoly over the student loan industry as well as reduce choices for families and schools. Some Democrats are wary too, about the possibility of steep job losses in the growing private student loan industry. Private lenders made about $56.7 billion in government-backed loans during the 2008-9 school year, compared with $20.1 billion from the Direct Loan program.

As with other contentious legislation, this bill could make its way through the House unscathed but get mired in the Senate. In May, Sen. Lamar Alexander, a Tennessee Republican, called such a plan “another Washington takeover.” Stay tuned.

Landon Hall – A freelance writer in Silicon Valley, Landon was a reporter, sports writer and editor at The Associated Press in Portland and New York City from 1997-2006.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Clint

    $1.2 Billion for Black colleges? We do live in a racist world.

  • http://www.Credit.com/ Gerri Detweiler

    I am not opposed to credit repair conceptually, but I have a hard time recommending most (not all) paid credit repair options. Most of the time the consumers I hear from don’t understand that what they are really paying for is for a company to do the work for them (or what that work really entails – which is often form letters). Instead they either believe (or are led to believe) that these companies can do things they can’t do themselves, including somehow remove all seriously negative information regardless of accuracy and/or increase their scores dramatically in a short period of time whether that’s true or not.

    I understand that sometimes consumers need help or guidance, and if they truly understand what they are getting into when they purchase credit repair, then that’s one thing. But I hear from consumers who believe that for the right price – sometimes thousands of dollars – their bad credit can go away quickly. I just spoke with someone in that situation last week who was about to spend $2800 she really couldn’t afford.

    When those consumers would be better off using that money to resolve debt or even to build savings to avoid future credit problems, then that’s when I think they need to weigh their options. And if teaching them what they can do on their own for free is self serving then I admit to being guilty as charged!

  • ana

    How much is it to fix my credit? Email me (email address deleted)

  • fuzzy77

    I understand the warning, but they stereotype agencies into one bad clump. Fact: I have gone through Lexington Law and Allen Michael. I have used both for 4 yrs. Allen Michael was 1st and got 12 negatives off my 3 reports. Lexington Law has gotten a total of 14 off . I have a total of 11 left spread across 3 reports. I may not be typical, but after being SCREWED by banks and defrauded by a Mortgage Broker, I have no issue if a creditor can not verify accuracy even for a debt I did have. It is their stupid game and I am going to play it legally and take full advantage of loopholes. After the fraud that forced a bankruptcy I went from a 740 to a 525…4 years later my mean FICO (not credit) score is a 667 and I was able to get a new CC and an auto loan and just qualified for a mortgage at 4.3% 30yr fixed.

Find out where you stand.
Get your FREE personalized credit report card.

Sign Up Now
X

Stay connected to our experts

Please submit your email address to get credit & money tips & advice
from our team of 30+ experts, delivered weekly to your inbox.